Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Plot Thins on the Clinton Email 'Scandal' - By Michael Tomasky
The rapidly-deflating Clinton email scandal looks like it has more to do with a sclerotic government bureaucracy than any personal wrongdoing on the part of Hillary.So over the weekend, the Times, which had already walked back some of the wilder implications of its Hillary Clinton-email reporting, did so just a little bit more. It did it under a provocative (though basically defensible) headline that tried to make it sound like the plot was thickening, but in fact this plot is thinning faster than Tony Blairs hair (seriously, have a look). What began life two weeks ago as another Clintons play by their own rules mega-scandal is now pretty clearly devolving into a what do you expect, its the government saga that is about as dog-bites-man as it gets.
The Times headline, on A1 Saturday, proclaimed: Emails Clinton Said Were Kept Could Be Lost. The article, co-bylined by the reporter who broke the original story and another, reported that the State Department did not start automatically archiving the state.gov email traffic of deputies until February of this year. This bit of information came from department spokeswoman Jen Psaki, who discussed this at her daily briefing the day before (i.e. last Friday).
Now. Remember what Clinton had said at her UN press conference last weekthat even though she used a personal address, everything she wrote to her deputies state.gov addresses was archived: The vast majority of my work emails went to government employees at their government addresses, which meant they were captured and preserved immediately on the system at the State Department.
Shes right that they were captured, but that doesnt mean they were archived, according to what Psaki said Friday. So the Times put those two factoids together and produced its Saturday piece, the most dramatic possible reading of events, which opened by informing readers that contrary to what Clinton had said, not everyone at State was required to archive their email correspondence, so maybe some of those emails she told us had been preserved had quite possibly not.
Its a defensible news story. But heres the thing. If you read farther down into the articleand certainly, if you read the transcript of Psakis Friday briefingthe picture that is very clearly beginning to emerge here is one of a lumbering department (is there any other kind when it comes to matters like this?) taking a long time (shocking!) to get itself into compliance with regulations and laws. Toward the end of the Times article, it quotes experts saying the kinds of throw-up-your-hands things that people say when they think a situation is unfortunate but not genuinely a scandal (it really is chaos across the government in terms of what agencies do, what individuals do, and people understand that they can decide what they save and what they dont).
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/15/the-plot-thins-on-the-clinton-scandal.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1270 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Plot Thins on the Clinton Email 'Scandal' - By Michael Tomasky (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2015
OP
onecaliberal
(32,862 posts)1. Republicans are going to appoint an independent investigator this week.
N.Y. to Paris
(110 posts)2. Of course they are....
It's what they do!
Govern? well.......not so much!