2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPro-gay rights Republican group: we've been barred from CPAC over members' sexuality
Source: The Guardian
Alan Yuhas in New York
Friday 20 February 2015 19.48 GMT
A pro-gay rights Republican group contends that it has been barred from sponsorship of next weeks high-profile Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, because of the sexuality of some of its members. The groups executive director dismissed procedural reasons cited by organizers.
Gregory Angelo said that for the third year in a row Log Cabin Republicans was being denied participation in the event, which is run by the American Conservative Union (ACU), because we might support marriage equality and we might have some members who identify as gay.
CPAC 2015 takes place in Washington DC from 25 to 28 February. Speakers will include senators and 2016 hopefuls Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, new Iowa senator Joni Ernst and the real-estate mogul and reality TV star Donald Trump.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
But the ACU, which organizes the event at which presidential hopefuls often seek to appeal to the GOP base, maintains that the Log Cabin Republicans simply never applied. A spokesman for the ACU flatly denied any bias against gay people, and provided a statement by chairman Matt Schlapp.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/20/log-cabin-republicans-gay-rights-barred-cpac-2015
mikeysnot
(4,757 posts)why you vote republican?????
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)tax breaks
mikeysnot
(4,757 posts)1% of the vote, but what about everyone else?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I cannot begin to fathom why anyone who is not a white heterosexual male Protestant would even begin to consider voting Republican.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)But at least you got your tax breaks.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)How do they not realize who (mostly) runs the GOP nowadays and their position on GLBT equality? There are a *small* handful of Republicans whom are GLBT-friendly but none of them are in leadership roles and none of them will be writing the platform. Are a few tax breaks REALLY worth belonging to a party that will take their votes, but hate them and will not only ignore their needs (and basic humanity) but actively work against them. *SMH*
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)So then sit there with your money & take it. The deserve everything they get for siding with these devils.