Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 05:08 PM Feb 2015

Trouble in Hillaryland: David Brock resigns from Hillary Clinton PAC

David Brock on Monday abruptly resigned from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, revealing rifts that threaten the big-money juggernaut being built to support Hillary Clinton’s expected presidential campaign.

In a resignation letter obtained by POLITICO, Brock, a close Clinton ally, accused Priorities officials of planting “an orchestrated political hit job” against his own pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters.

Those groups – along with another pro-Clinton group, the super PAC Ready for Hillary – had their fundraising practices called into question last week by a New York Times report. It pointed out that veteran Democratic fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner got a 12.5 percent commission on funds she raised for Brock’s groups, and a smaller percentage commission on cash she raised for Ready for Hillary.

In his letter to the co-chairs of Priorities’ board – former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina – Brock alleged that “current and former Priorities officials were behind this specious and malicious attack on the integrity of these critical organizations.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/david-brock-resigns-priorities-usa-action-115028.html#ixzz3RHg57Rnw

I have a close relative who works for Brock, and who has been talking for months about how much effort money and manpower his organizations were preparing to put behind the Hillary campaign; can't wait to find out what the inside scoop is and what this now means.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trouble in Hillaryland: David Brock resigns from Hillary Clinton PAC (Original Post) Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 OP
Wow. They act just like Republicans, Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #1
Yes, shocking isn't it? Kelvin Mace Feb 2015 #3
This made me chuckle - DURHAM D Feb 2015 #2
Not sure why; it appears to be true Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 #4
Word is Brock is about to change his allegiance. My guess is he knows Hillary's ship it's sinkin-maybe he's ready to come on board w/ Elizabeth? InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2015 #5
Or Bernie. Either one would be an upgrade. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2015 #6
NO...because she's not running. brooklynite Feb 2015 #10
Perhaps you are not aware that he was DURHAM D Feb 2015 #8
Yeah, but he had that epiphany years ago Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 #9
"Et tu, Brockus?" Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #7
Harold Ickes glommed onto Priorities USA PAC. AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #11
Gee, I shocked! HappyMe Feb 2015 #12
Let's Start Turning itcfish Feb 2015 #13
Yep, that's why many of us barely show up here anymore. Beacool Feb 2015 #15
you mean, like this? antigop Feb 2015 #18
Oh snap! HappyMe Feb 2015 #19
Hillaryland? Beacool Feb 2015 #14
Wait, wait, I know the answer to this one Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 #16
Well I'm going to stick around for awhile. Nice to see you posting again. I'm a Democrat and I'll libdem4life Feb 2015 #17
Thank you. Beacool Feb 2015 #20
Boggles the mind. libdem4life Feb 2015 #21
Yes, it does........... Beacool Feb 2015 #22

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Wow. They act just like Republicans,
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 05:16 PM
Feb 2015

greedily skimming the funds and fighting among themselves over sharing out the bribes.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. Yes, shocking isn't it?
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 05:39 PM
Feb 2015

And people keep calling me names when I say it will be next to impossible to vote for HRC.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
4. Not sure why; it appears to be true
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 05:41 PM
Feb 2015

As I said, I'm pretty familiar with one of his organizations, and they're completely in the bag for Hillary and have been coordinating with her people extensively. It'll be interesting to see if and how that continues, going forward.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
5. Word is Brock is about to change his allegiance. My guess is he knows Hillary's ship it's sinkin-maybe he's ready to come on board w/ Elizabeth?
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 05:59 PM
Feb 2015

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
8. Perhaps you are not aware that he was
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 07:15 PM
Feb 2015

chief muckraker and conspiracy promoter against the Clinton administration in the 90s. Glad he had an epiphany but it is funny.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
9. Yeah, but he had that epiphany years ago
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 07:47 PM
Feb 2015

and has been a Clintonista ever since. There's no greater zeal than that of the convert...

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
11. Harold Ickes glommed onto Priorities USA PAC.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:53 PM
Feb 2015

Last edited Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:49 AM - Edit history (1)

He got in on the ground floor and snatched it for Hillary's exclusive use when Obama was done with it. The first thing they did was announce they would sit out the 2014 election in preparation for Hillary's run in 2016.

Harold Ickes is a long time Clinton ally and advocate. He represented her at the meeting of Dem officials in Florida re: disposition of Florida and Michigan delegates. He passed on her message that she might take the fight it to the convention floor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/us/politics/01rules.html?pagewanted=all

The big news of the day was the final words of Ickes' argument: "Mrs. Clinton has instructed me to reserve her rights to take this to the credentials committee."


http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2008/05/harold-ickes-not-happy

The Democratic Party’s biggest super PAC, recently retooled as an early pro-Hillary Clinton effort, will sit out the midterm elections this year.

A spokesman with the group, Priorities USA Action, confirmed to BuzzFeed on Wednesday night that it would not be involved in House or Senate campaigns.


http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/key-democratic-group-will-sit-out-midterms#.xwrDr1yWa

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
15. Yep, that's why many of us barely show up here anymore.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 05:19 PM
Feb 2015

This place has become as nasty and vile as any RW site when it comes to the Clintons. Unfortunately for the perpetual haters, in the real world the Clintons are very popular within the party.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
14. Hillaryland?
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 05:13 PM
Feb 2015

Priorities USA Action is a PAC. It is not part of any official Hillary campaign, particularly since she still hasn't announced she's running.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
17. Well I'm going to stick around for awhile. Nice to see you posting again. I'm a Democrat and I'll
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015

back the Democrat that can win. If that happens to be The One that the Republicans fear the most, then sobeit. If they start to fear someone else later on, I'm in on that too. I'm not invested in WHO it is just that we don't get a couple more Thomas' on the SCOTUS and a few other little benefits of a Democrat in the White House.

Let Democrats move forward with sanity and unity...nobody gets everything they want. There are millions of us and only one person can be the D Candidate then President.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
20. Thank you.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:32 PM
Feb 2015

I don't come here that often anymore. The negativity and vicious attacks on people who I respect and like was wearing me down. There's enough stress in the real world to have to spend one's free time continually arguing with people on an internet site.

Going by what I read around here on a regular basis, some will not vote for the nominee if that nominee is Hillary. I guess they think that a Republican will do a better job in the WH. It's a "cut your nose to spite yourself" approach to politics. Ridiculous and ineffective.







Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Trouble in Hillaryland: D...