Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 03:01 PM Feb 2015

With an eye on the primary, Jeb Bush signals a campaign against liberalism

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/eye-primary-jeb-bush-signals-campaign-liberalism/

-snip-

The ‘fire in the belly’: One of the potential criticisms of Jeb Bush as a candidate is that he doesn’t have the “fire in the belly,” that he’s been out of the game. Well, he was no Fred Thompson at his speech and following Q&A Wednesday at the Detroit Economic Club. Bush came across as a man very much engaged and, above all, ready to make a robust case for conservatism, one that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan failed to do. He may have been a little stilted stylistically on TelePrompTer and much better in the Q&A, but he signaled that a third Bush presidential campaign, if he embarks on one, would be, in part, a crusade against liberalism, in particular liberal economic theory — and he won’t be afraid to take the message to places Republicans have been accused of overlooking. “I say: Let’s go where our ideas can matter most, where the failures of liberal government are most obvious,” Bush said of cities like Detroit. “Let’s deliver real conservative success.”

-snip-

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With an eye on the primary, Jeb Bush signals a campaign against liberalism (Original Post) LiberalElite Feb 2015 OP
Campaign Against Liberalism....Who can blame him NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #1
Liberalism is all about protecting the property interests pscot Feb 2015 #2
What? NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #3
You've been here long enough to post 18,000 + times? LiberalElite Feb 2015 #6
Read Locke and Hume pscot Feb 2015 #7
ok LiberalElite Feb 2015 #9
he might as well, dems certainly spend little effort defending liberalism nt msongs Feb 2015 #8
Go the fuck away Bush!!!! onecaliberal Feb 2015 #4
Jeb Bush’s humiliating whiff: Why bad polls and a lame speech are killing his hype. GeorgeGist Feb 2015 #5
His speech lacked details, because his party's policies CREATED the "Opportunity Gap." Thor_MN Feb 2015 #12
Wonder if he will similarly be visiting the conservative failed state Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2015 #10
We need a nominee who will defend government as a useful tool to help people. craigmatic Feb 2015 #11
Whoever s/he is, will be far better than the most enlighted Republican (nt) question everything Feb 2015 #13
There is a LOT of room to run with this Cosmocat Feb 2015 #16
Something new and different ... go get 'em Jeb. LOL libdem4life Feb 2015 #14
Please proceed. n/t winter is coming Feb 2015 #15
This just is not a winner for republicans Cosmocat Feb 2015 #17

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
1. Campaign Against Liberalism....Who can blame him
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 03:04 PM
Feb 2015

If I was a spoiled white rich prick who never worked a day in his life, who benefited from profits from all kinds of illegal an immoral activity, who benefited from racism and bigotry, I wouldn't want true liberals to get anything done here either

pscot

(21,024 posts)
7. Read Locke and Hume
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 04:39 PM
Feb 2015

the guys who invented it. Liberalism was a progressive idea in 1695. Not so much now days.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
12. His speech lacked details, because his party's policies CREATED the "Opportunity Gap."
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:43 AM
Feb 2015

How are you going to detail the fix for that problem, when you created it? He certainly can't say "you know, they were right, Supply Side, Trickle Down was a colossal fuckup. I'm going to raise taxes on the rich and lower taxes on the poor.."

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,436 posts)
10. Wonder if he will similarly be visiting the conservative failed state
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 06:45 PM
Feb 2015

of Kansas (and many other "red states" run by Republicans)?

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
11. We need a nominee who will defend government as a useful tool to help people.
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 08:03 PM
Feb 2015

I doubt we get one though.

Cosmocat

(14,570 posts)
16. There is a LOT of room to run with this
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:54 AM
Feb 2015

EASY pickings to BOTH point out the failures of trickle down economics AND the importance of our safety net during these tricky economic times.

However, given the nature of democrats, YES, likely someone scared of his or her own shadow.

Cosmocat

(14,570 posts)
17. This just is not a winner for republicans
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:00 AM
Feb 2015

The people of this country are ... well, not sharp about politics, for sure.

But, there is just TOO FAR to big of a gap between reality and this spin they are trying to do when we have a decent economy overall, but stagnation of wages for most, where it is LIBERAL policies that are a problem.

People will lap up republican bullshit in big heaping doses, but this one just is not going to fly because overtly times are just not bad enough, they can't blind people with fear on this. MAYBE if it was a big economic downturn and you had a democratic president you could sell it, but when times are OK, not great, not horrible, hard to get people to buy trickle down when it has been such an unmitigated failure. They can't run AGAINST PBO on this.

I am absolutely sure they will gin something else up, but unless the economy takes a big downturn, this ain't it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»With an eye on the primar...