Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

big_dog

(4,144 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 04:51 PM Nov 2014

Sioux Tribe: Keystone XL Pipeline Vote Is ‘Act Of War’

The president of a South Dakota-based Native American tribe says it will be an “act of war” if Congress authorizes construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. “We are outraged by the lack of intergovernmental cooperation,” Rosebud Sioux Tribe President Cyril Scott said in a statement. “We are a sovereign nation and we are not being treated as such,” Scott said in response to Friday’s House vote to approve the project. “We will close our reservation borders to Keystone XL. Authorizing Keystone XL is an act of war against our people.”


The tribe isn’t alone in its fight to stop the construction of the pipeline, which would bring tar sands oil from Canada down to refineries in the Gulf of Mexico. Members of Wica Agli, a Native American activist group, arrived in Washington, D.C., on Monday to back Scott and the Cowboy Indian Alliance, a multi-state activist organization, as the Senate prepares to vote on the project on Tuesday.

Wica Agli co-founder Aldo Seoane said his group wants to help in any way possible.

“The proposed route for the pipeline passes through the Ogallala Aquifer, which is North America’s largest fresh water aquifer,” he said. “In this and other ways, the pipeline threatens Native and non-native ways of life. Lately there seems to be more awareness of Indigenous issues in the media, but the House vote illustrates the unwillingness to acknowledge Indigenous’ treaty rights.” At last count, the Keystone bill sponsored by Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) appeared one vote shy of the 60 votes needed for a final vote to pass the legislation. http://thehill.com/regulation/energy-environment/224368-tribe-keystone-vote-is-act-of-war

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sioux Tribe: Keystone XL Pipeline Vote Is ‘Act Of War’ (Original Post) big_dog Nov 2014 OP
Congress cannot break treaties so all the better to veto with! Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2014 #1
It will be interesting to see Goverment response Midnight Writer Nov 2014 #2
It happened in Rhode Island Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #4
Cons don't care about Native Americans Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #3

Midnight Writer

(21,768 posts)
2. It will be interesting to see Goverment response
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:20 AM
Nov 2014

I expect the Sioux Nation will conduct unarmed non-violent protests to block construction on their land. They may well be joined by mostly white farmers whose land is being taken by eminent domain.

Will the Federal Marshalls and the National Guard actually be ordered to use force against American citizens to "protect" the rights of a foreign corporation (Trans-Canada) to take land away from Americans?

Where are Cliven Bundy and his armed goons when we need them? They seem to know how to get their way.

Ampersand Unicode

(503 posts)
4. It happened in Rhode Island
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:33 PM
Nov 2014

The Narragansett tribe was selling cigarettes on "sovereign land." That land became not so sovereign when the state of Rhode Island decided they weren't getting a cut of the profits via taxes, and sent their law-enforcement goons to roughhouse the store owners in an effort to shut down the "illegal" cigarette shop. Whatever your feelings about smoking, the fact remains that this was yet another slap-in-the-face land grab by the big white "land owners" whose "eminent domain" (*cough* state revenue *cough*) supersedes the ostensible sovereignty of the native peoples who were supposed to have at least a little sliver of property given back to them.

Not surprisingly, all of the cops had the charges dropped, while the Narragansetts involved in the skirmish faced indictments for assaulting police.



Moral of the story: Property rights only matter if it's white people's property. Rich white people (or even the gentrified suburbs). If Keystone wanted to build a fucking oil refinery smack dab in the middle of the projects, you better believe our government would exercise the right of "eminent domain" to plow all of Compton to the ground. No way in hell this would be the case if they were looking to build in the Hamptons or Beverly Hills.

Unless they were to build on Will Smith's princely mansion in Bel-Air and not, say, Tom Cruise's private space pod.

Ampersand Unicode

(503 posts)
3. Cons don't care about Native Americans
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:21 PM
Nov 2014

...or anyone who isn't a rich, elderly WASP from old money.

Next Thursday we "celebrate" the ostensible "breaking of bread" between New England "Pilgrims" and Native Americans... before we destroyed their native land under the auspices of the European notion of "property rights." Wouldn't be long before the Commonwealth theocrats started immolating people for practicing "witchcraft," based on hysterical nativist hatred of the indigenous beliefs of the peoples they stole this country from.

And I say that as a Bay Stater. I hate Thanksgiving, Columbus Day too.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sioux Tribe: Keystone XL ...