Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCode Pink disrupts ISIS/ISIL Senate Armed Services Committee (VIDEO)
Last edited Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:35 PM - Edit history (2)
Code Pink disrupts Armed Service Committee hearing on ISIS / ISIL U.S. involvement multiple times on September 16th, 2014. Madea Benjamin and other protesters had several banners as they shouted anti-war messages.
Story here: http://egbertowillies.com/2014/09/16/code-pink-disrupts-isisisil-senate-armed-services-committee-hearing-multiple-times/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1346 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Code Pink disrupts ISIS/ISIL Senate Armed Services Committee (VIDEO) (Original Post)
egbertowillies
Sep 2014
OP
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)1. Pink Is The Color Of Courage.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)2. Do they still Stand with Rand?
?w=350&h=250
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)4. This Rand Paul?
After President Barack Obama announced on Wednesday his strategy for expanding the war against ISIS into Syria, Sen. Rand Paul offered his rebuttal, alleging that the war was unconstitutional without congressional authorization; it was an obvious move, being the libertarian-ish conservative that he is. Less duh was Paul's endorsement of the war itself: This is an intervention, and I dont always support interventionbut this one I support.
Well, up to a point. Paul is OK with bombing Syria. He just doesnt want to support the moderate rebels who are fighting ISISand the Bashar al-Assad regimethere. To foreign policy hawks, its a hopelessly naive, convoluted, possible flip-flop of a strategy.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/11/why-rand-paul-suddenly-wants-to-bomb-syria.html
Well, up to a point. Paul is OK with bombing Syria. He just doesnt want to support the moderate rebels who are fighting ISISand the Bashar al-Assad regimethere. To foreign policy hawks, its a hopelessly naive, convoluted, possible flip-flop of a strategy.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/11/why-rand-paul-suddenly-wants-to-bomb-syria.html
mgcgulfcoast
(1,127 posts)3. thank god for these people
Obama is sending us into another war.