Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 01:12 PM Apr 2014

GOP Rep. Ted Yoho implies the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional

The former large animal veterinarian isn't sure ending Jim Crow would've been to the framers' liking

ELIAS ISQUITH


Tea Party Congressman Ted Yoho, a freshman from Florida who had previously worked as a large animal veterinarian, is in the news again, but not for his exceptionally poor timing or faulty understanding of how credit works. No, this time Yoho is getting attention for remarks he made about the Civil Rights Act (CRA) at a town hall meeting on Monday. Yoho, you see, isn’t so sure that whole ending-Jim-Crow thing was constitutional.

Asked by an African American constituent whether he considers the CRA, which turned 50 earlier this month, to be constitutional, Yoho, after repeating the question, responded, “Is it constitutional, the Civil Rights Act? I wish I could answer that 100 percent. I know a lot of things that were passed are not constitutional, but I know it’s the law of the land.”

Yoho’s implication that the CRA wasn’t going anywhere, even if it wasn’t constitutional, was preceded by a few brief sentences on the Constitution’s role in America’s many social and legal transformations. “This country grew through a lot of growing pain,” Yoho explained. “We’re going through it again. As we grow as a country and prosper, we’re going to go through it again in the future. That’s why I’m so thankful for the Constitution because it allows us to do that.”

You can watch Yoho claim the Constitution allows societal change literally right before he implies it doesn’t below, via ThinkProgress:



###

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/15/gop_rep_ted_yoho_implies_the_civil_rights_act_is_unconstitutional/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Rep. Ted Yoho implies the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2014 OP
Yoho is an idiot Gothmog Apr 2014 #1
I feel sorry for those large animals... catbyte Apr 2014 #2
Yoho is a Yaa-who. Laffy Kat Apr 2014 #3
I imply that Ted Yoho is an idiot. Brigid Apr 2014 #4
If I'm not mistaken, Rand Paul feels exactly the same way. Loudly Apr 2014 #5
Crazy talk. blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #6
GOP talk. AlinPA Apr 2014 #8
Oh yes, mr fuckup wants some money frome his racist constituents. ugly mf Cha Apr 2014 #7
And institutional racism is A-OK? sakabatou Apr 2014 #9
He makes a few remarks like this occasionally so his voters don't start to think he's Japanese. eom tarheelsunc Apr 2014 #10

Laffy Kat

(16,383 posts)
3. Yoho is a Yaa-who.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 01:27 PM
Apr 2014

I'm leaving for Fla-la-la tomorrow morning to visit relatives for ten days. Wish me luck down there. At least all my relatives down there are active progressives, so I won't feel isolated.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
5. If I'm not mistaken, Rand Paul feels exactly the same way.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 02:23 PM
Apr 2014

Freedom of association means the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»GOP Rep. Ted Yoho implies...