Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGOP Rep. Ted Yoho implies the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional
The former large animal veterinarian isn't sure ending Jim Crow would've been to the framers' likingELIAS ISQUITH
Tea Party Congressman Ted Yoho, a freshman from Florida who had previously worked as a large animal veterinarian, is in the news again, but not for his exceptionally poor timing or faulty understanding of how credit works. No, this time Yoho is getting attention for remarks he made about the Civil Rights Act (CRA) at a town hall meeting on Monday. Yoho, you see, isnt so sure that whole ending-Jim-Crow thing was constitutional.
Asked by an African American constituent whether he considers the CRA, which turned 50 earlier this month, to be constitutional, Yoho, after repeating the question, responded, Is it constitutional, the Civil Rights Act? I wish I could answer that 100 percent. I know a lot of things that were passed are not constitutional, but I know its the law of the land.
Yohos implication that the CRA wasnt going anywhere, even if it wasnt constitutional, was preceded by a few brief sentences on the Constitutions role in Americas many social and legal transformations. This country grew through a lot of growing pain, Yoho explained. Were going through it again. As we grow as a country and prosper, were going to go through it again in the future. Thats why Im so thankful for the Constitution because it allows us to do that.
You can watch Yoho claim the Constitution allows societal change literally right before he implies it doesnt below, via ThinkProgress:
###
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/15/gop_rep_ted_yoho_implies_the_civil_rights_act_is_unconstitutional/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1912 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Rep. Ted Yoho implies the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional (Original Post)
DonViejo
Apr 2014
OP
He makes a few remarks like this occasionally so his voters don't start to think he's Japanese. eom
tarheelsunc
Apr 2014
#10
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)1. Yoho is an idiot
Yoho is a large animal veterinarian and is clueless about constitutional law
catbyte
(34,403 posts)2. I feel sorry for those large animals...
and his constituents who didn't vote for this moran.
Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)3. Yoho is a Yaa-who.
I'm leaving for Fla-la-la tomorrow morning to visit relatives for ten days. Wish me luck down there. At least all my relatives down there are active progressives, so I won't feel isolated.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)4. I imply that Ted Yoho is an idiot.
Nah, I'll just say it outright: Ted Yoho, you are an idiot.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)5. If I'm not mistaken, Rand Paul feels exactly the same way.
Freedom of association means the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)6. Crazy talk.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)8. GOP talk.
Cha
(297,322 posts)7. Oh yes, mr fuckup wants some money frome his racist constituents. ugly mf
sakabatou
(42,158 posts)9. And institutional racism is A-OK?
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)10. He makes a few remarks like this occasionally so his voters don't start to think he's Japanese. eom