Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tim4319

(3,077 posts)
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:42 AM Mar 2014

Once and for all! Can someone please help me understand something????

Can Ted Cruz be president? I was under the impression that he is not eligible to be president, however, every time I turn on the television, there's a poll about how he can be the GOP front runner.

Thank you in advance,

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Once and for all! Can someone please help me understand something???? (Original Post) Tim4319 Mar 2014 OP
Though his father is Cuban and he was born in Canada rocktivity Mar 2014 #1
We must demand to see his Canadian birth certificate rdharma Mar 2014 #5
It was already posted Gothmog Mar 2014 #14
Thanks for the info rdharma Mar 2014 #16
She was born in Delaware. former9thward Mar 2014 #20
okay so Ted Cruz's mother can run for president. He's still an alien, isn't he? Bill USA Mar 2014 #31
Not under U.S. law. former9thward Mar 2014 #32
Indeed.Let's stoop to their level. Idiocracy! Boo ya! Luminous Animal Mar 2014 #6
It's not being vindictive if .... rdharma Mar 2014 #17
What is confusing is that the definition is not fixed or written into the Constitution karynnj Mar 2014 #33
Short answer: no, we can't help you understand. Deep13 Mar 2014 #2
He IS legally eligible Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #3
Cruz was born in Canada. He has a 'Canadian birth certificate'. If he decides to run... Tx4obama Mar 2014 #4
It will be as the same as the Obama nonsense. former9thward Mar 2014 #21
But it is NOT the same as Obama. Obama was born in the United States. Cruz was not. n/t Tx4obama Mar 2014 #22
U.S. law on this is settled. former9thward Mar 2014 #23
As I posted on another thread: HeiressofBickworth Mar 2014 #7
Recall when repigs wanted Swarzzenegger for prez? xfundy Mar 2014 #8
I don't think the Koch Brothers want him to be president, so he won't be jmowreader Mar 2014 #9
under the law he is an american beachbum bob Mar 2014 #10
You're unclear on the law. He's not eligible to be President. Not of sound mind. nt MADem Mar 2014 #12
Waited for that one. Thank You. kairos12 Mar 2014 #26
The law doesn't allow for American citizens to run for President. It only allows for natural born US okaawhatever Mar 2014 #35
He CAN be President of the USA!!!! MADem Mar 2014 #11
That is not what the law is. former9thward Mar 2014 #24
Truth of the matter is, this will go to the Supreme Court if he is nominated. MADem Mar 2014 #27
His mother is a US citizen. It doesn't matter where he was born. He's an American. Sunlei Mar 2014 #13
to run for President (but not lower office) you must be a "natural born citizen". So, being an okaawhatever Mar 2014 #36
Remember - there are TWO strains of Birthers... brooklynite Mar 2014 #15
This treestar Mar 2014 #19
He is a "natural-born citizen" DavidDvorkin Mar 2014 #18
There is no "definitive" definition of "natural born." MADem Mar 2014 #28
Well next time you see him...... whistler162 Mar 2014 #25
McSame ran in '08, and he was born in Panama. blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #29
McCain was born on a U.S. military base, which is considered to be 'U.S. soil'. n/t Tx4obama Mar 2014 #30
S.Res. 511 (110th): A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen JHB Mar 2014 #34
There are only two kinds of citizens: Natural born or naturalized. He was not naturalized. hack89 Mar 2014 #37

rocktivity

(44,580 posts)
1. Though his father is Cuban and he was born in Canada
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:50 AM
Mar 2014

his mother was born in Delaware. So unless SHE renounced her U.S. citizenship somewhere along the line, Cruz is eligible. But think of all the fun we "neo-birthers" can have!!!


rocktivity

Gothmog

(145,635 posts)
14. It was already posted
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 11:33 AM
Mar 2014

The issue is whether Carnival Cruz's mom meets all the requirements. We have not seen her birth certificate and that she lived in the US for the required period before the birth of Carnival Cruz

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
16. Thanks for the info
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:10 PM
Mar 2014

Cruz' Canadian birth certificate should be shown as often as possible!

You know .... for the sake of full disclosure.

former9thward

(32,095 posts)
20. She was born in Delaware.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 05:33 PM
Mar 2014

That makes her instantly a citizen. No need of living in the US for any particular length of time.

former9thward

(32,095 posts)
32. Not under U.S. law.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 06:47 PM
Mar 2014

He is considered natural born if his mother is a citizen and he is born anywhere in the world. This last came up in 2008 with McCain being born on Panama soil. The Senate (including Obama) unanimously passed a resolution saying it was proper for him to run.

karynnj

(59,506 posts)
33. What is confusing is that the definition is not fixed or written into the Constitution
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:29 AM
Mar 2014

With the definition you give, there should have been no question with Obama - even IF he would have born in a Kenya hospital. His mother - born in Kansas - was JUST as American as Cruz's Delaware born mother.

As it was, Obama was born in the USA - and his hospital put an announcement in 2 Hawaii papers at that time.

There was a challenge (to Obama) that tried to define native born as requiring two American parents that was rejected recently in VT.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
2. Short answer: no, we can't help you understand.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:50 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:17 PM - Edit history (1)

There is no specific definition for "natural born citizen" in Article II. The "all persons born or naturalized" definition from the 14th Amendment is the definition of a citizen, not necessarily a "natural born citizen." Congress wrote it to make sure former slavers would be citizens, not to determine if they were eligible for the presidency. So no, we cannot tell you if Cruz is legally eligible. As a practical matter, however, no, he will never be president.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
3. He IS legally eligible
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:54 AM
Mar 2014

His mother was a citizen and, assuming she didn't renounce her citizenship, that passed to him. Of course, the Teabaggers won't care for a second because he's white.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
4. Cruz was born in Canada. He has a 'Canadian birth certificate'. If he decides to run...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:57 AM
Mar 2014

... there will be a lawsuit filed and he will have to fight it out in court.

More than likely it will go all the way up to the Supreme Court.

former9thward

(32,095 posts)
21. It will be as the same as the Obama nonsense.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 05:39 PM
Mar 2014

Only kooks actually filed suits against Obama. No elected Republican ever did. Only kooks will file against Cruz. No elected Democrat will.

former9thward

(32,095 posts)
23. U.S. law on this is settled.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:24 PM
Mar 2014

His mother was born in the U.S. That is why no elected Democrats have said anything about the Cruz issue. I really doubt he will be the nominee so it will be a non-issue.

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
7. As I posted on another thread:
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:49 AM
Mar 2014

Before focusing on Cruz as the most likely opponent, his eligibility to run for President should be confirmed. He was born in Canada and still has dual citizenship as far as I know. His father is Cuban (was he a US citizen when Teddie was born?). His mother's status is unknown -- she was American but did she live in Canada for fewer than 10 years in order to pass her US citizenship to her son? See: http://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-parents

By focusing on him when his eligibility is in question, we don't spend the time on the wackadoodle policies of other Repubs like Rand Paul and Jeb Bush. So far, I view Cruz as a red herring.

So, in other words: SHOW US THE LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
8. Recall when repigs wanted Swarzzenegger for prez?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 03:04 AM
Mar 2014

Of course, he then screwed up Califo-- scuse me, "Gullyvornia"-- in a monumental manner. But that's what repigs do.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
9. I don't think the Koch Brothers want him to be president, so he won't be
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:30 AM
Mar 2014

Teabaggers are bad for the bottom line.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
10. under the law he is an american
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 07:43 AM
Mar 2014

don't know why you don't understand that. We can have dual citizenships.

okaawhatever

(9,468 posts)
35. The law doesn't allow for American citizens to run for President. It only allows for natural born US
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:13 PM
Mar 2014

citizens. That's why it didn't come up when he ran for Senate. The rules are different for Senators. The Constitution didn't really define "natural born" and congress has not done a very good job either. We need to revisit the rules for all these situations when no one is running so it doesn't become a partisan issue.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. He CAN be President of the USA!!!!
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:18 AM
Mar 2014

So long as USA stands for "Unmitigated Shitheels' Association!"

But no, he cannot be President of the United States of America. Jenifer Granholm (who would be a fine President, IMO) can't either, because she was born in Canada.

former9thward

(32,095 posts)
24. That is not what the law is.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:27 PM
Mar 2014

Ever wonder why no elected Democrats comment on this issue? Its because they know what the law is too.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
27. Truth of the matter is, this will go to the Supreme Court if he is nominated.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:36 PM
Mar 2014

There is no definition of "natural born" anywhere.

To me, "natural born" is Boooorrrrrn .... in the USA!!!!!" Or a territory, like Puerto Rico, Guam, or the Panama Canal Zone. About the only reason one could be born OUTSIDE the USA and still be "natural born" is if a parent of the child was abroad in the employment/service of the United States Government. IMO, anyway--of course, that just my take.

However, the Supremes might decide to adjust the definition to suit their biases, and we'll be stuck with it forevermore...unless/until someone finds a way to revisit the matter.

Years ago, there was a guy named Christian Herter who was seen as a grand potential president, but he never ran because he was of the view--and it was shared by others--that he was not "natural born" because he was born in Paris, I believe.

Ahh, yes, here is some discussion of it, also revolving around Mitt's daddy:

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/crs-the-natural-born-citizen-qualification-for-the-office-of-president-is-george-w-romney-eligible-1968/


There is no doubt that Congress, by appropriate statute, may constitute any person a “citizen at birth”, that is, one who is a citizen solely by virtue of the circumstances of his birth; illustrative statutes are referred to herein. There would seem to be no doubt, either, that by virtue of one such statute, Governor Romney has been a citizen from the moment of his birth. The critical question, however, is whether, in all instances, one who is made by statute a citizen at and from his birth is, because of that alone, a “natural born” citizen within the meaning of the constitutional requirement. “Citizen at birth” and “natural born” citizen are not necessarily synonymous. Did the Framers have in mind that only one class of persons might properly be regarded as “natural born citizens”? If so, what was this class? Or did they contemplate that the Congress, by appropriate statute, might thereafter, and from time to time, give specific and possibly varying meanings to that phrase; just as Congress may from time to time, make provision for who may become, or are to he considered as, citizens. If the meaning of the term, as intended by the Framers, can be modified only by a Constitutional Amendment, did the Fourteenth Amendment have any such effect? As indicated, the answers to these questions, in the view of some, are not free of doubt.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
13. His mother is a US citizen. It doesn't matter where he was born. He's an American.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:34 AM
Mar 2014

It's his Canadian citizenship that should be scrutinized. Cruz said he didn't know he had Canadian citizenship ( he got both at birth, USA because his mom is USA and Canadian because he was born there)

Was that a lie and does he have investments in Canada using his Canadian citizenship? and why won't he fill out the paperwork to get rid of that Canadian citizenship?

okaawhatever

(9,468 posts)
36. to run for President (but not lower office) you must be a "natural born citizen". So, being an
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:20 PM
Mar 2014

American citizen isn't enough.

The Guardian has followed up on his renouncing his citizenship and as of January he hadn't done it. Not only that, the Canadians got involved. Lolz.

Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for the conservative Tea Party favorite from Texas, said on Saturday that lawyers are preparing the paperwork. She said Cruz, who was born in Calgary, Alberta, "has been fully focused on fighting for Texans' values and interests" and "looks forward to the process being completed soon".

Frazier's response came after a Canadian immigration attorney said the process was simple and wondered about the delay.

Richard Kurland, a Vancouver-based immigration attorney, told the Associated Press on Friday that unless there was a security or mental-health issue that hadn't been disclosed, renouncing citizenship was a simple, quick process.

"If he's attempting to bring our system into disrepute by suggesting it's lengthy and complex, it's just not true. Revocation is one of the fastest processes in our system," said Kurland.

brooklynite

(94,767 posts)
15. Remember - there are TWO strains of Birthers...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 11:51 AM
Mar 2014

One believes that you're ineligible if you're born outside the US. The other believes that you're ineligible if you don't have two US Citizen parents.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
19. This
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 03:46 PM
Mar 2014

Cruz qualifies because he was an American citizen at birth.

But to the insane birthers who quote Vattel about natural born meaning your parents are also both citizens, Cruz does not qualify. Watch them twist in the wind to figure out why he is different from Obama in that regard.

DavidDvorkin

(19,493 posts)
18. He is a "natural-born citizen"
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:58 PM
Mar 2014

because of his American parent. The Constitution specifies "natural-born" not "native-born".

MADem

(135,425 posts)
28. There is no "definitive" definition of "natural born."
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:58 PM
Mar 2014

See this link: http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/crs-the-natural-born-citizen-qualification-for-the-office-of-president-is-george-w-romney-eligible-1968/

Your head will hurt as you slosh through this---mine did, anyway.

The Supremes will decide this if the jerk gets the nomination, and they'll probably decide for the little cretin, but the issue isn't so much "Who's yer daddy?" like they were trying to pull with Obama; the issue is "Where were you born?" Obama was born on US soil; Cruz was not.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
25. Well next time you see him......
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:32 PM
Mar 2014

ask him when Thanksgiving is! If he says mid-October he is really Canadian

or when he is at a ball game play O' Canada imstead of the Star Spangled Banner and see if he stands and sings along. If he does then he is Canadian!

JHB

(37,163 posts)
34. S.Res. 511 (110th): A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:45 PM
Mar 2014

Cosponsored by Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. RES. 511

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 10, 2008

Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Obama, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. Clinton, and Mr. Webb) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

April 24, 2008

Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

April 30, 2008

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States;

Whereas the term “natural born Citizen”, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the “natural born Citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term “natural born Citizen”;

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

That John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres511/text


Because what kind of idiotic fanatics would you have to be to dispute that sort of thing? Oh, wait, the ones who do 180s when someone with a D is in the White House, that's who.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
37. There are only two kinds of citizens: Natural born or naturalized. He was not naturalized.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:22 PM
Mar 2014

therefore he can be president.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Once and for all! Can som...