Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 10:03 AM Jan 2014

Another Chris Christie outrage: Data shows stark racial gap in Sandy aid distribution

"Neglect and callous indifference" for black and Latino Sandy victims, group charges

JOSH EIDELSON


Amid growing questions about lane closures on the George Washington Bridge and Sandy aid to Hoboken, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is facing an additional charge about his administration’s disbursement of relief aid. State data, obtained from the Christie administration through a lawsuit by the Fair Share Housing Center, reveal a dramatic racial gap in who received preliminary approval for funds from Sandy relief programs.

According to the data, decried by groups including the New Jersey NAACP, the Latino Action Network and the New York Times editorial board, the Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Elevation and Mitigation Program rejected 35.1 percent of African-American applicants, 18.1 percent of Latino applicants, and only 13.6 percent of Caucasian applicants. The Resettlement Program rejected 38.1 percent of African-Americans, 20.4 percent of Latinos and 13.6 percent of Caucasians.

Speaking to Salon late last week, FSHC staff attorney Adam Gordon urged the federal government to expand its investigation to include the racially disparate aid distribution, accused the Christie administration of trying to change the topic by attacking his organization, and charged “neglect and callous indifference in the needs of Latino and African-American communities impacted by Sandy.” A condensed version of our conversation follows.

Your assessment of this data shows that African-Americans were more than twice as likely as whites to get rejected by the RREM program and by the Resettlement program. What explains that disparity?

more
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/22/new_chris_christie_outrage_data_shows_stark_racial_gap_in_sandy_aid_distribution/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another Chris Christie outrage: Data shows stark racial gap in Sandy aid distribution (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
They used ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #1
Another chapter in Christie-Gate Nancy Waterman Jan 2014 #2
A real can of worms ailsagirl Jan 2014 #3
Worse, I am glad this is all being exposed. more to come in my opinion..no text.. Stuart G Jan 2014 #4
Oh, I *know* ailsagirl Jan 2014 #5
How amazing that justice might be done flamingdem Jan 2014 #6
I don't want to honor Gov. Christie with an anything-gate. Looking more like a Black Hole. libdem4life Jan 2014 #7
Need to look at GOP v. other split. It might be sharper. nt SDjack Jan 2014 #8
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. They used ...
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jan 2014

completely race/ethnicity neutral criteria to determine program eligibility/priority ... Oh, wait!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
7. I don't want to honor Gov. Christie with an anything-gate. Looking more like a Black Hole.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:59 AM
Jan 2014

He deserves something special, but we won't know much until the subpoenas or the fearful staffers start to fear prison more than protect Christie.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Another Chris Christie ou...