Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 04:50 PM Jan 2014

New Jersey Assembly Committee Finds Christie Pal In Contempt

ERIC LACH – JANUARY 9, 2014, 2:18 PM EST

A New Jersey legislative committee on Thursday found a former Port Authority of New York and New Jersey executive in contempt for refusing to answer questions connected to the George Washington Bridge lane closing scandal.

Before the committee voted, Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D), the chairman of the Assembly Transportation, Public Works and Independent Authorities Committee, said that David Wildstein's decision to refuse to answer questions from the committee "places him in contempt of this committee, which is a misdemeanor."

Wildstein asserted his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent at the start of the hearing, and his lawyer later argued that the committee would not be acting appropriately if it did find Wildstein in contempt.

"I would submit that the rules that the chair just cited are at variance with the United States and New Jersey constitutions," Wildstein's lawyer, Alan Zegas, said.

more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/wildstein-contempt

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Jersey Assembly Committee Finds Christie Pal In Contempt (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
Wildstein has not been charged with anything yet, so how can he take the fifth? JimDandy Jan 2014 #1
While I agree with you the 5th Amendment is fairly clear on this point... Swede Atlanta Jan 2014 #2
Hmm, that's interesting. JimDandy Jan 2014 #3
So what crime could he be charged with if he did testify? Jersey Devil Jan 2014 #5
Grant him immunity - force him to testify. Blue Idaho Jan 2014 #4
Reminds me of lancer78 Jan 2014 #6

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
1. Wildstein has not been charged with anything yet, so how can he take the fifth?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 04:54 PM
Jan 2014

The contempt charges seem appropriate in those circumstances.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
2. While I agree with you the 5th Amendment is fairly clear on this point...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jan 2014

that this right only applies in the context of a criminal case, it is generally accepted law that a witness before Congress or other legislative body can invoke the right IF they have reason to believe their testimony MAY BE or IS LIKELY TO BE used against them in a future criminal case.




Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
5. So what crime could he be charged with if he did testify?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:08 PM
Jan 2014

Unless closing the lanes as part of a political vendetta constitutes a crime he has no right to claim the 5th imo.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New Jersey Assembly Commi...