Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe New, Not Necessarily Improved, Chris Christie
By Lloyd Grove December 30th 2013 5:45 AMIn a flash, the 2016 contender has seen his reputation slide from straight-talking pragmatist to partisan bully. Could a local scandal really take down Hillarys biggest competition?
Wow, that was quick.
It took Sen. John McCain, the straight-talking maverick from Arizona, eight long yearsbetween the presidential campaigns of 2000 and 2008to be transformed from media darling to media target. But for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the process was completed in a political nanosecond.
Less than two months after his landslide reelection, in which he beat Democratic opponent Barbara Buono by a 21-point margin, the Republican governor is undergoing the sort of media metamorphosis that sometimes befalls popular statewide politicians who dare to think of themselves as future presidents.
To paraphrase Franz Kafka, Christie awoke one morning last week and, reading the front page of The New York Times, discovered that hed been changed into a giant bully. In his new media incarnation, he was suddenly a politician who wreaks petty revenge and humiliation on any poor soul who is unwise enough to cross him, and who countenanced the closure of two local access lanes of the George Washington Bridge, causing vehicular chaos for four days in Fort Lee, N.J., where the Democratic mayor had declined to endorse him.
This, for a public official who previously had been portrayed in the national media as a truth-telling, tough-talking executive who was willing to reach across the aisle to get things done.
:::snip:::
full article
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/12/30/the-new-not-necessarily-improved-chris-christie.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1102 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New, Not Necessarily Improved, Chris Christie (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2013
OP
BlueMTexpat
(15,372 posts)1. He got exactly what he deserved, IMO.
I just wish that the same fate would befall other GOpers sooner rather than later.
Given the retention capacity of too many already uninformed voters, however, it's probably not wise to count him out completely. Yet.
The same factors that may make comparatively reasonable GOPers think twice about him (any Dem who wasn't already skeptical about him needs to reexamine what their Democratic principles truly are) are exactly what GOPer TB'ers love. The meaner and pettier, the better in their eyes.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)2. The fact that he is willing to go to such lenagths to get revenge is the most
troubling aspect of this, particularly when you ponder the president's role as a world leader. Pretty sobering...
Gothmog
(145,489 posts)3. The NYT has a good editorial on Politicians who Bully
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/opinion/sunday/the-elected-bullies.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1388440562-G4QsuW0laG8bpCnz2ROLKQ
Once in office, however, he begins using that prod more against political enemies than problems of state, wielding his powers to punish critics, skeptics and those of questionable loyalty, while lavishly rewarding supporters. The brashness that seemed fresh and appealing in a debate loses its charm when it becomes the vengeful voice of a city or state, and voters then regret their choice. At least until the next charismatic bully comes along.
Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey is the most current example. As Kate Zernike of The Times reported last week, he has had aides deliver obscenities to a union official who criticized him on the radio. His administration removed the police protection for one state senator (and former governor) after the senator was seen as too dilatory in approving the governors nominees. When a Rutgers political scientist serving on the redistricting commission chose a plan favored by Democrats, Mr. Christie defunded two of his programs at the state university. And his associates have recently been accused of deliberately creating traffic jams in Fort Lee, N.J., in an act of vengeance against the citys mayor.