Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scottx2

(20 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 11:02 AM Dec 2013

Finally a Sheriff Joe Arpaio related case hits the Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT NEWS - FIRST AMENDMENT ATTACK UPON ARIZONA HARASSMENT STATUTE - Sheriff Joe not happy

Scott Huminski v. City of Surprise, Arizona
United States Supreme Court -,Docket 13-7504
Washington D.C.


In a filing received by the U.S. Supreme Court, government is portrayed fervently defending a state criminal harassment statute that makes any speech contrary to the government's goals a crime under.AZ Rev. Stat. § 13-2921 (criminal harassment).


Speech that tends to "alarm, annoy or harass" anyone, including government officials and police, is a crime in Arizona. Silencing dissent is the hallmark of a police state.


Petition for Writ of Certiorari here...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/178501012/Supreme-Court-Certiorari-Petition-and-Appendix-First-Amendment-attack-upon-Arizona-Harassment-statute

U.S. Supreme Court Docketing papers here,...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/188167075/Supreme-Court-Docketing-Huminski-v-Arizona-harassment-statute1

No surprise that this statute exists in Arizona. Under the patently unconstitutionally vague and overbroad Arizona harassment statute, this Supreme Court litigation is a crime as is this article when read by a resident of Arizona, say … Sheriff Joe Arpaio. No doubt that the Supreme Court litigation and this posting tends to "annoy" the Sheriff and like-minded residents of Arizona.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Finally a Sheriff Joe Arpaio related case hits the Supreme Court (Original Post) scottx2 Dec 2013 OP
Every court has ruled against you. former9thward Dec 2013 #1

former9thward

(32,026 posts)
1. Every court has ruled against you.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 06:05 PM
Dec 2013

If you can't win at the Ninth circuit you can't win anywhere. The SC will not take this case. I read thru the decision and the court made the right decision.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Finally a Sheriff Joe Arp...