Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 06:53 AM Oct 2013

Obamacare fight vs. birth of Social Security: Which was uglier?

I was wondering how the public felt and what politicians were saying back when SS was introduced. I googled and found this excellent assessment of the situations surrounding Social Security and Medicare implementation and how it compares to ACA. It would appear to me that the same arguments then are what they are saying now.

When Medicare was introduced, even Ronald Reagan got involved prior to his presidency by making a recording "in which he painted a dark picture of a time in which doctors would be told by the government which patients they could see, and where."

EXERPT:

Experts say Social Security, in the 1930s, and Medicare, in the 1960s, were established at times when the partisan divide between Republicans and Democrats was not nearly as strong as it is today.

In addition, during both periods the Democrats pushing for the programs had a much stronger grip on political power.

“There were some people very strongly opposed to Medicare (and) very strongly opposed to Social Security, but politically they did not have the clout that those opposed to Obamacare, or ACA, have today,” said Daniel Beland, a professor of public policy at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, and an expert on the U.S. Social Security and Medicare systems.

Still, the fears about Social Security and Medicare are surprisingly similar to the ones critics have raised about the Affordable Care Act today.

=======

You may enjoy reading the entire article. NBC News, 1 Oct 2013, by Allison Linn

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obamacare fight vs. birth of Social Security: Which was uglier? (Original Post) KewlKat Oct 2013 OP
It's a cycle of lies and propaganda TxDemChem Oct 2013 #1
k&r n/t RainDog Oct 2013 #2
I plan to read the article before the sun rises this morning, IrishAyes Oct 2013 #3

TxDemChem

(1,918 posts)
1. It's a cycle of lies and propaganda
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 07:05 AM
Oct 2013

I wonder how it feels to be on the wrong side of history so often?

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
3. I plan to read the article before the sun rises this morning,
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 08:00 AM
Oct 2013

Yet even now I hope it gives due credit to Frances Perkins, the first woman ever to gain presidential cabinet status. SS was not originally FDR's idea. She pushed for it relentlessly until wisely, he could see the light. Of course it would've gone nowhere w/o his eventual support, but it kinda aggravates me how often history overlooks her due credit. Far as I'm concerned, SS should hardly ever be mentioned w/o including a note about her role.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obamacare fight vs. birth...