2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGOP Hawks: This Will Not Stand, Rand
By ALEXANDER BURNS | 7/26/13 3:34 PM EDT
The Republican Partys hawks are finally saying it out in the open: This aggression will not stand, Rand.
After three years of watching the GOPs non-interventionist wing gather strength, there are mounting signs that a more combative set of national security conservatives have reached their breaking point. Now, prominent conservative leaders in what used to be considered the Bush-Cheney mold are increasingly taking the offensive against their intra-party rivals.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie publicly challenged libertarian Republicans Thursday to explain their skepticism about government surveillance to the families of 9/11 victims, declaring at a Republican Governors Association event: I want them to come to New Jersey and sit across from the widows and the orphans and have that conversation.
New York Rep. Peter King said this week that he will explore a 2016 presidential run to wrest control of the defense debate from small-government advocates such as Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ted Cruz of Texas, and warned that an America-first candidate would stand little chance of defeating Hillary Clinton.
Perhaps the most dramatic provocation to Paul-aligned conservatives came earlier this month, when Republican national security activist Liz Cheney the former vice presidents daughter announced a primary challenge to Wyoming Sen. Mike Enzi, a low-key incumbent backed by Paul and a number of other Senate colleagues.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/rand-paul-republican-hawks-94817.html#ixzz2aHwRN8SK
Oh this is going to be fun to watch, indeed!
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Waterboarding each other
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Really? What a strange thing to say. I think an "America first" candidate would be refreshing. Too bad there aren't any, at all.
This guy just indirectly hinted that they don't care about America.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)The simple fact is that the party that would like to be seen as the party of small government, fiscal responsibility and low taxes simply can't also be the party of defence spending which is greater than the sum of all other countries combined, while America secretly blows past its own debt ceiling:
http://www.etfguide.com/commentary/1092/Has-the-U.S.-Treasury-Already-Exceeded-the-Debt-Limit?/
It just doesn't add up.