Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:40 AM Apr 2012

An explanation for the disparity in polls

[the Gallup track, which is conducted among registered voters, has a sample that looks much more like the electorate in 2010 than the voting population that is likely to turn out in 2012: only 22 percent of the Gallup survey was non-white, according to figures the organization provided to Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz. That was close to the non-white share of the vote in 2010 (23 percent), but in 2008, minorities comprised 26 percent of all voters, according to exit polls; the Obama campaign, and other analysts, project the minority share of the vote will increase to 28 percent in 2012. In its survey, Pew, for instance, puts the non-white share at 25 percent.

][link:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/18/1084449/-Daily-Kos-Elections-Polling-Wrap-How-demographics-can-account-for-disparities-in-Obama-Romney-polls|

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An explanation for the disparity in polls (Original Post) RDANGELO Apr 2012 OP
Fox has a simpler method grantcart Apr 2012 #1

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
1. Fox has a simpler method
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 11:23 AM
Apr 2012

They oversample Republicans.

Next poll published look at the cross tabs and you will see they have the Republicans and Democrats at parity.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»An explanation for the di...