2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBenghazi Review Board To Issa: Talk To Us In Public, Not In Private
Benghazi Review Board To Issa: Talk To Us In Public, Not In Private
Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Michael Mullen are refusing a request from Rep. Darrel Issa to meet in private, preferring a public airing.
Thomas Pickering and Michael Mullen called the proposed closed-door proceeding an inappropriate precondition to their testifying before the committee in a letter sent Thursday to Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight panel. The letter was made public by the State Department.
In the past week members of your Committee have publicly criticized in both an open hearing and in the media the work of the Accountability Review Board [ARB], the retired diplomat and the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wrote. Having taken liberal license to call into question the Boards work, it is surprising that you now maintain that members of the Committee need a closed-door proceeding before being able to ask informed questions at a public hearing.
http://www.alan.com/2013/05/16/benghazi-review-board-to-issa-talk-to-us-in-public-not-in-private/
MORE details here: http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/terrorism/300127-benghazi-auditors-refuse-meeting-with-issa-
clarice
(5,504 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)That Issa is a slimy piece of shit and it's pretty obvious that the only reason he want's to meet in private is to massage the questions and answers into a new ball of bullshit.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Anansi1171
(793 posts)Cirque du So-What
(25,980 posts)This isn't gonna sit well with the Maserati thief.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Such a piece of shit.
rtracey
(2,062 posts)The reason he wants to talk in private is because he knows what they are going to say, and it will look bad for him,if they prove Obama was not part of a cover-up or conspiracy. My thinking is they would say in private, then Issa would come out and say that their testimony is not relevant, and not put them in the public
on point
(2,506 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Issa is about as slimy an eel-like creature that ever existed. (No offense to eels.)
joc46224
(62 posts)I work in an office where I am the sole Democrat. All my co-workers are either Republican's or right leaning Independents. When the whole Benghazi thing came out before the election it was all my co-workers wanted to talk about. Now the only thing they say about Benghazi is how sick to death they are of the whole thing. The polls show that America is tired of this issue and the more the GOP goes on and on about it (while ignoring real issues) the lower their approval ratings are. Plus that fact that they are trying to whip up scandal after scandal is actually diluting the impact of each. People are in scandal overload so are tuning out (except for the most rabid Obama haters whose rantings further weaken the credibility of the accusers.) I'm glad the GOP is trotting out all of this stuff now because by 2014 mid-terms no one will care. Sort of like how Hillary wore out the whole Reverend Wright/Bill Ayers issue in the primary so that it had very little, if any, impact during the general election.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Every time I've clicked around on the TV (the past several months) and stopped to see what they're talking about on FoxNews 95% of the time it's been Benghazi.
If I was a GOPer that watched FoxNews I'd have stopped watching all that Benghazi BS along time ago.
Cha
(297,655 posts)tanyev
(42,613 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)He needs to keep this smear campaign against Obama/Hillary going.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)now when it looks like the real truth is finally coming out he wants it private. Such a despicable partisan hypocrit.
summerschild
(725 posts)It will be interesting to see if he tries his usual incivility, disrespect, and bullying on these two gentlemen.
I would love to see them make a total fool out of him - so spectacularly that every news outlet in the country reports it.
(I can dream, can't I?)
Blue_Roses
(12,894 posts)squirm. The man is nuts.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Beacool
(30,251 posts)In the past week members of your Committee have publicly criticized in both an open hearing and in the media the work of the Accountability Review Board , the retired diplomat and the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wrote. Having taken liberal license to call into question the Boards work, it is surprising that you now maintain that members of the Committee need a closed-door proceeding before being able to ask informed questions at a public hearing.
Good for you, ambassador!!!