Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Wed May 8, 2013, 09:53 AM May 2013

A couple of notes regarding Sanford's win in SC.

1) The polls probably missed because people were embarrassed to say they were voting for him.

2) This is a case of the voters behaving rationally (given their crazy policy views). Sanford is there to vote for their policy preferences. He's clearly a better fit for a Teahadist district in terms of how he will vote. Would you vote for Anthony Weiner or Peter King?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A couple of notes regarding Sanford's win in SC. (Original Post) geek tragedy May 2013 OP
One commentator observed that when Sanford switched his campaign from "me" gateley May 2013 #1
Look for remnants of the machine still kicking votes to Rethugs. peace13 May 2013 #2
3) ... GeorgeGist May 2013 #3
The state that elected Jim Demint with massive majorities. geek tragedy May 2013 #4
True. treestar May 2013 #5
It was a crowded field (I believe) Proud Liberal Dem May 2013 #6

gateley

(62,683 posts)
1. One commentator observed that when Sanford switched his campaign from "me"
Wed May 8, 2013, 09:57 AM
May 2013

to the policies, that's when it turned around.

Also heard a reporter say essentially what you did -- she spoke to voters who gave a lot of thought to their votes, really had a problem with Sanford's behavior, but in the end were more in line with his policies than with Colbert Busch's.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
2. Look for remnants of the machine still kicking votes to Rethugs.
Wed May 8, 2013, 10:04 AM
May 2013

It sound like a perfect set up. The Rethugs say they aren't backing him but continue to pull strings on the count. The polls were wrong in Ohio and that was a result of election theft. I am always skeptical of exit polls not matching the outcome. Give KKKarl a call and see if he knows anything about this.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. The state that elected Jim Demint with massive majorities.
Wed May 8, 2013, 10:26 AM
May 2013

Where Lindsay Graham is considered a moderate squish.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. True.
Wed May 8, 2013, 10:35 AM
May 2013

I'm more appalled at his victory in the primary. The fact he is a hypocrite on family values and used public funds to see his mistress should have meant that the Teahadists were willing to vote for any other Republicans without that record instead of him. That is where their true hypocrisy lies.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
6. It was a crowded field (I believe)
Wed May 8, 2013, 11:30 AM
May 2013

it's easier for candidates like him to squeeze through a bigger field where he doesn't have to win as many votes. Republicans almost knocked off Dan Burton in the primaries in 2008 or 2010 but because there were so many people running against him (evidence of even Republican's disdain for him), he managed to squeak through an won another primary. However, he did not run again in 2012 and is, presumably (hopefully), permanently retired now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A couple of notes regardi...