solid establishment credentials and ability to draw big donations
Eisenhower, of course, was the nominee in 1952 because, after a long military career, he had been Supreme Commander of Allied forces in Europe, a position that required real political skill and that gave him instant name recognition; moreover, he was a genuine Republican by the standards of the time. Eisenhower's vice-president Nixon had been in politics for a decade and a half by 1960, having gained name recognition by red-baiting during the McCarthy era; and Nixon knew how to use whatever political powers he had to help his financial backers; so he was a natural choice for the party in 1960. The 1964 nominee Goldwater had similarly been in politics for a decade and a half by 1964, including over a decade in the Senate; he had a solid business background, and he was willing to change position for political gain, as in the case of his sudden opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, where he unexpected discovered that states rights were more important than interracial equality. The party nominated Nixon again in 1968 and 1972. Ford, the 1972 GOP choice after Nixon's fall, had been in Congress more than 25 years before replacing Agnew as vice-president. Reagan, the nominee in 1980 and 1984, had a career as an actor and then a career as GE spokesman, and had impeccable conservative credentials after two terms as California governor. Reagan's vice-president Bush I had been a two term Representative, UN ambassador, RNC chair, and CIA director before becoming the 1988 and 1992 nominee. Dole, the party's choice in 1996, had served in the Senate nearly thirty years. Bush II, the 2000 and 2004 nominee, had served two terms as governor of Texas and (more importantly) had all the advantages of Bush I's wealth and political connections. McCain, the 2008 candidate, had gained political attention after his release by the Vietnamese in 1973; by 2008, he had served in Congress for a quarter of a century. The GOP's 2012 choice Romney had an enormously successful business career, leading to other successes, such as leadership positions in the LDS and in the 2002 Winter Olympics, followed by a term as Utah governor
Paul is a libertarian anti-tax ideologue, who was first elected to public office in 2010. Conservatives will like his anti-tax stance, but conservative big business folk will greatly dislike the fact that he is a libertarian ideologue: they really want a President who will dance "with them that brung him to the party" -- a rule that Nixon and Reagan (say) understood very well
= new reply since forum marked as read
