2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumEd Markey Wins Massachusetts Democratic Senate Primary
Last edited Tue Apr 30, 2013, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)
BOSTON -- Businessman and former Navy SEAL Gabriel Gomez and veteran U.S. Rep. Edward Markey will face each other in a special election in Massachusetts for the U.S. Senate seat previously held by John Kerry.
Unofficial returns show Markey won the Democratic nomination in a primary on Tuesday and Gomez won the Republican nod.
Markey defeated fellow U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch. Gomez won a three-way primary against former U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan and state Rep. Daniel Winslow.
Markey has served in the U.S. House since 1976 and is the dean of the state's congressional delegation. He had the early backing of Kerry, who resigned from the Senate to become U.S. secretary of state.
-snip-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/30/ed-markey-wins_n_3189362.html
---------
The Special Election will be June 25th.
Ed Markey, Democrat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Markey
Gabriel Gomez, Republican: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_E._Gomez
Richard Heos, Independent: (no bio on Wiki)
gateley
(62,683 posts)Cha
(297,322 posts)thanks TX!
We need a Navy SEAL who stands with Markey!
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)And... thank YOU for all of your past replies
Cha
(297,322 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Now.... how much of a threat is Gomez?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)John Kerry to do what he can within his duties. Maybe Warren can help as well, despite her busy schedule.
It would be great to once again see two Democratic Senators for the great state of MA.!
P. S. Thanks for all your OPs and replies, too, Tx4obama. You keep us up to date on the things we need to know.
Mass
(27,315 posts)but MA is not TX.
But certainly, Warren can help, and frankly, so could Lynch, though it may be difficult for him.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)I wonder if Teresa might speak of how Markey and Kerry were a team on climate change since the Rio conference that all three attended. Warren does have a busy schedule - but less busy than Kerry had in 2012 when he helped Warren. He was chair of a major committee and was on more committees than most Senators and did a lot of special foreign missions for OBama.
Markey could have the entire congressional delegation, Governor Patrick, and most of the local government in MA pulling for him. As people have mentioned, this is NOT 2010 when people were very angry about the economy and fell for a campaign where Brown rarely mentioned he was Republican. I saw some of the NECN coverage and I heard overjoyed Republicans speaking of "I was a Seal" being this year's "I drive a truck" and saying that good looks and image could trump issues. (Basically conceding that on issues he is pretty much on the wrong side of almost all of them.
I thought that Markey did a nice job in his speech speaking of the additions that he wrote to insure more inspections (at ports ?) to keep us safer. This I assume is a counter to the "I was a Seal". The fact is Markey has already done what a Congressman or Senator CAN do on national security -- where what Gomez did as a Seal 17 years ago is something he deserves respect and thanks for, but is not really something that translates to the job of Senator. ( ie John Kerry's expertise on terror was the result of his work in the Senate on things like BCCI - not his youthful heroism on a swiftboat.) I suspect that Markey's emphasis on this is to minimize any gain that Gomez can get versus him on national security.
I suspect that the dynamic on this will end up at its heart like 2012 did. Markey will vote for Reid; Gomez will vote for McConnell. That basic argument meant more than if Brown was likable or not - and it was the same as when Kerry defeated the very popular Weld. (Warren and Markey both had far more substance than their opponents, but that is another point.)
I also wonder if - like Romney - the fact that the successful career was in private equity could hurt. Was he Romney lite?
Gomez's speech was well written, but it's whole point is that Markey has spent his life in public service. He sees that as a negative - but it also can be a positive compared to being a money grubbing private equity guy. (How well did that work for Romney? )
freshwest
(53,661 posts)http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/01/29/1510041/sandy-aid-republican-hypocrites/?mobile=nc
Voting with McConnell would be voting against the interests of MA infrastructure. The choice is clear to us, I'm surprised anyone voted for Brown the way he behaved. Warren had a hard campaign and I am so glad MA gave her a chance to reclaim that seat. I hope that all the pols that can will be out there for Markey.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)and so will some Democratic strategists who were not hired by Markey.
We just got out of the "Lynch could win" zone (who cares that he was behind even in his internal polls), and are already entering the Gomez could win period. I guess media have to be able to write about something.
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)It's a no-brainer: Senator Edward Markey!
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)graywarrior
(59,440 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Gomez garnered 88,325, or 51 percent of the votes, compared with 62,848 votes, or 36 percent, for former US attorney Michael J. Sullivan, and 22,830, or 13 percent, for state Representative Daniel B. Winslow, with 95 percent of precincts reporting.
Markey received 293,273, or 57 percent of the votes, compared with 217,174 votes, or 43 percent, for his opponent, US Representative Stephen F. Lynch, with 95 percent of precincts reporting.
-snip-
http://boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/04/30/three-democrats-two-republicans-compete-special-senate-primary/NZVqJxD6hBFeo4X264aLcJ/story.html
Immabk
(8 posts)I saw your figures. Half a million dems got out as opposed to 175 thousand republicans. Now if we can keep the outside interests out and curb our penchant for electing young handsome douche bags, we should be fine.
Massachusetts won't be fooled again!
karynnj
(59,504 posts)called for the people's pledge.
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)We can't afford to be complacent like we did with Martha Coakley.
Massachusetts Democrats, liberals, progressives...GET OUT AND VOTE!!