Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 07:25 PM Mar 2013

Senator Feinstein on assault weapons ban: 'I’m not going to lay down and play dead'


Feinstein on assault weapons ban: 'I’m not going to lay down and play dead'

(CNN) – Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Tuesday she’s not going to stop fighting to get a vote on her proposed ban on semi-automatic firearms modeled after military assault weapons, hours after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that the measure has no chance of passing the chamber.

“This is very important to me. And I’m not going to lay down and play dead,” Feinstein, D-California, said on CNN’s “The Situation Room.”

Reid, D-Nevada, told reporters he won't keep the proposed ban in gun legislation heading to the full Senate for consideration because including it would guarantee the measure would be blocked by a Republican filibuster. But he said he wants to ensure a vote on the ban will still take place.

The ban has been fiercely opposed by the National Rifle Association, Republicans and some Democrats would get fewer than 40 votes, Reid said, far below the threshold needed to defeat a filibuster or pass the Senate.

Instead, Feinstein could propose the ban as an amendment to the gun legislation on the Senate floor in order to get a vote on it, Reid said.

-snip-

Full article here: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/19/feinstein-on-assault-weapons-ban-im-not-going-to-lay-down-and-play-dead/



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senator Feinstein on assault weapons ban: 'I’m not going to lay down and play dead' (Original Post) Tx4obama Mar 2013 OP
Question libdude Mar 2013 #1
I suspect in this case, they determined their legislation would not pipoman Mar 2013 #3
The problem was assuming that an AWB actually had widespread Dem support in the Senate hack89 Mar 2013 #4
I think it will always be a judiciary committee reject..in either house.. pipoman Mar 2013 #2

libdude

(136 posts)
1. Question
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 07:37 PM
Mar 2013

Is the Senate or House actually incapable of achieving anything? Perhaps this may be the best argument to eliminate representative government, switch to direct democracy.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
3. I suspect in this case, they determined their legislation would not
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 07:51 PM
Mar 2013

survive a constitutional challenge...that is the job of the judiciary committee..

hack89

(39,171 posts)
4. The problem was assuming that an AWB actually had widespread Dem support in the Senate
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 08:03 PM
Mar 2013

A look at the Senate Dems up for reelection in 2014 makes it very clear why the Senate was not going to pass an AWB.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
2. I think it will always be a judiciary committee reject..in either house..
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 07:49 PM
Mar 2013

further I believe it reinforces the fact that there are pro-2nd amendment Democrats...contrary to the rebuts in the land of the hiding puppies ('delicate flowers' is accurate, just overused IMHO).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Senator Feinstein on assa...