Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shouldn't the sequester have frozen congressional paychecks? (Original Post) Uben Mar 2013 OP
It wouldn't make much difference BillStein Mar 2013 #1
The senate and Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #2
The Senate is Congress Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #3
The 27th amendment doesn't allow that to happen. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #4
Frozen paychecks. And they should stop cleaning the bathrooms in the Capitol Building (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Mar 2013 #5
Obviously yes, but do you honestly think they would ever subject themselves to that? talkingmime Mar 2013 #6

BillStein

(758 posts)
1. It wouldn't make much difference
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 10:45 AM
Mar 2013

most congress persons are wealthy. Witholding pay works better on people who live paycheck to paycheck

LiberalFighter

(50,945 posts)
4. The 27th amendment doesn't allow that to happen.
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 11:21 AM
Mar 2013

Some focus needs to be on how little work they do and spending so much time away from Congress.

 

talkingmime

(2,173 posts)
6. Obviously yes, but do you honestly think they would ever subject themselves to that?
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:58 AM
Mar 2013

It's fine for the rest of us to get bent over, but what's good for the goose isn't always what's good for the gander. Personally I think that they should all have to find their own private insurance, since that's what the want for the rest of us. But hey, they've got a sweet deal, they know it, and they plan on keeping it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Shouldn't the sequester h...