Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumUpdate - Cruz Responds to The New Yorker -- CRUZ DOUBLES DOWN: COMMIE SLUR 'ABSOLUTELY CORRECT'
Ted Cruz Responds: Harvard Law Was Full of Communists
Senator Ted Cruz has responded to The New Yorkers report that he accused Harvard Law School of having had twelve Communists who believed in the overthrow of the U.S. Government on its faculty when he attended in the early nineties. Cruz doesnt deny that he said this; instead, through his spokesman, he says he was right: Harvard Law was full of Communists.
His spokeswoman Catherine Frazier told The Blaze website that the substantive point in Cruzs charge, made in a speech in 2010, was was absolutely correct.
She went on to explain that the Harvard Law School faculty included numerous self-described proponents of critical legal studiesa school of thought explicitly derived from Marxismand they far outnumbered Republicans. As my story noted, the Critical Legal Studies group consisted of left-leaning professors like Duncan Kennedy, who is a social democrat, not a Communist, and has never believed in the overthrow of the U.S. Government.
Among those who have taken issue with Cruzs castigation of the Harvard Law School faculty are his former law professor, Charles Fried, who is a well-known Republican and former Solicitor General to Ronald Reagan. In his 2010 speech, Cruz had said there was only one Republican on the faculty, but his former professor, Fried, told The New Yorker there were at least four, including himself. A spokesman for Harvard Law School, Robb London, also described the school as puzzled by Cruzs allegations.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/02/ted-cruz-responds-harvard-law-was-full-of-communists.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1635 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update - Cruz Responds to The New Yorker -- CRUZ DOUBLES DOWN: COMMIE SLUR 'ABSOLUTELY CORRECT' (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Feb 2013
OP
ZRT2209
(1,357 posts)1. isn't that against the ethics code for attorneys
to disparage the legal profession and other attorneys?
@statebaroftexas
steve2470
(37,457 posts)2. it probably is in Texas, but there's an out for him
He could claim, disingenuously, that he's only making a "statement of fact" and not casting aspersions. I have no doubt he would use this defense if he was called on it by the Texas state bar.
eta:
A lawyer should
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other
lawyers and public officials.
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other
lawyers and public officials.
http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Grievance_Info_and_Ethics_Helpline&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFileID=96
Jeff Murdoch
(168 posts)3. McCarthyism redux
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)4. Yeah, the "Texas will be Blue soon" meme
is pretty dumb.