Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumInhofe and his stalagmites - Charlie Pierce on the Hagel hearing
A couple of choice quotes, starting with the aforementioned stalagmites (though they come at the very end of the article)
Hagel's not running to be a diplomat and, frankly, given our experience with that steaming hunk of neocon man-meat, Don Rumsfeld, I'd just as soon not have the Defense Secretary involved in the formulation of foreign policy as much as he is in making sure the grunts who have to carry it out have sufficient body armor. That, by all accounts, is what Hagel sees the job as being about. What some mullah may have mumbled about him may echo loudly among the stalagmites in Jim Inhofe's brain, but it has absolutely no relevance to the rest of us as far as Hagel's ability to run a Defense department. There is some criticism rising that Hagel was not properly prepared for his testimony. I'm not sure anybody could have been. How could anyone be properly prepared for Jim Inhofe and Ted Cruz in the same day? Those kind of mushrooms are still illegal.
Read more: Chuck Hagel Nomination Hearings - Today In Hagel Bashing - Esquire http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Today_In_Hagel_Bashing#ixzz2Jm7DVzqu
At times, Hagel seemed thrown off-balance by the ferocity with which some of his former colleagues wielded the trivial and the non-material. (Lindsey Graham was conspicuously beset by the vapors.) He may, in fact, not done his cause any favors by trying to keep the questioning limited to what how he would advise the president on the management of the American military, which is, after all, the job he's trying to get. The primary issue seemed to be Hagel's relationship with the state of Israel or, more specifically, the state of Israel that people like Graham and Cruz find politically useful. The structure of the argument to say nothing of the tactics employed was straight out of the Cold War 1950s, with Israel standing in for the Captive Nations Of Eastern Europe, and some sort of vague alliance of Islamist groups standing in for the Warsaw Pact. I half-expected one of the Republicans to ask us to offer a rosary on the behalf of the souls in chains.
Read more: Chuck Hagel Nomination Hearings - Today In Hagel Bashing - Esquire http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Today_In_Hagel_Bashing#ixzz2Jm7p3KEE
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1243 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inhofe and his stalagmites - Charlie Pierce on the Hagel hearing (Original Post)
Inuca
Feb 2013
OP
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)1. Thanks! This guy is quite a writer, and OH SO opinionated!
I don't always agree with him, but do like his style.
Inuca
(8,945 posts)2. The stalagmites +
"these mushrooms are still ilegal" is worth the price of admission