Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDid the Pro-Life Movement Lead to More Single Moms?
A legacy conservatives have not grappled with.By Naomi Cahn and June Carbone
Posted Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2013, at 2:48 PM ET
As the co-authors of Red Families v. Blue Families, we often give talks about the recent rise in whats called the nonmarital birthrate, or the idea that more than 40 percent of children are now born to women who arent married. Sometimes at our talks someone will come up to us, confess his or her encounter with single parenthood, and say something like: When my daughter got pregnant and decided to keep the child, we were OK with that because we are Christians. When she decided not to marry the father, we were relieved because we knew he would be bad for her and the marriage would never work.
They express these two beliefsthat they are Christian and thus uncomfortable with abortion and that they are relieved their daughter decided to raise the child aloneas if they are not connected. But in fact this may be one of the stranger, more unexpected legacies of the pro-life movement that arose in the 40 years since Roe v. Wade: In conservative communities, the hardening of anti-abortion attitudes may have increased the acceptance of single-parent families. And by contrast, in less conservative communities, the willingness to accept abortion has helped create more stable families.
Researchers have considered many reasons for the rise in the nonmarital birthratethe welfare state, the decline of morals, the increasing independence of women, even gay marriage. But one that people on neither the left nor the right talk about much is how its connected to abortion. The working class had long dealt with the inconvenient fact of an accidental pregnancy through the shotgun marriage. As blue-collar jobs paying a family wage have disappeared, however, so has early marriage. Women are then left with two choices: They can delay childbearing (which might entail getting an abortion at some point) until the right man comes along or get more comfortable with the idea of becoming single mothers. College-educated elites have endorsed the first option, but everyone else is drifting toward the second. In geographical regions and social classes where the stigma for having an abortion is high, the nonmarital birthrate is also high. Without really thinking about it or setting up any structures to support it, women in more conservative communities are raising children alone. This is a legacy the pro-life movement has not really grappled with.
In Red Families v. Blue Families, we pointed out the irony that blue states, despite their relatively progressive politics, have lower divorce and teen birthrates than red states. In fact the college-educated middle class, partly by postponing having children, had managed to better embody the traditional ideal: that is, a greater percentage of children being raised in two-parent families. In response, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat admitted that it isnt just contraception that delays childbearing in liberal states, its also a matter of how plausible an option abortion seems, both morally and practically, depending on who and where you are. Although he conceded that the red family model can look dysfunctionalan uneasy mix of rigor and permissiveness, whose ideals dont always match up with the facts of contemporary life, he argued that it reflects something else as well: an attempt, however compromised, to navigate post-sexual revolution America without relying on abortion.
-snip-
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/01/did_the_pro_life_movement_lead_to_more_single_moms.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1056 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did the Pro-Life Movement Lead to More Single Moms? (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jan 2013
OP
dsc
(52,169 posts)1. I don't know about single motherhood overall
but I do think it has corresponded with a massive increase in pregnant students in school.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. Seems obvious, yes?
One of the reasons you get an abortion is because you don't feel you have adequate help for the job of raising a child?
question everything
(47,544 posts)3. The Palins as role models? (nt)