Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:47 AM Dec 2012

Fiscal cliff: Republicans have no principles


There's no deal because the GOP's confused: They're against voting to raise taxes, even if that raises taxes more

BY JONATHAN BERNSTEIN


What’s truly amazing about the issues involved in the fiscal cliff is, at the end of the day, just how easy a compromise should be.

This isn’t a decision about war and peace, or abortion, or gay and lesbian rights – issues on which compromise is exceedingly hard to find because of the nature of the issue. A nation can’t be halfway at war; abortion either is or isn’t murder. Budget disputes – overall spending totals, and especially tax questions – are by nature just not like that. A few billion more for the Pentagon or a few billion less? That’s exactly the kind of question normally solved by striking a deal.

Now, granted, even in cases where the two sides eventually compromise, it might not seem as if they will, even right up to the last minute. And it’s always more difficult than just picking a number halfway between what both sides want. After all, bargaining power may not be equal; right now, Democrats control both the White House and one chamber of Congress, so they might be able to get a bit closer to their ideal point than will the Republicans, who have only the House. Meanwhile, both sides may inflate their original bids; it takes quite a bit of bargaining to get to where negotiators’ true positions are revealed, thus allowing for the difference to be split (or for the side better at bluffing to do a bit better than it should).

But, yes, if it’s just money, it should be very possible to split the difference.

So why is this one so hard? Because Republicans aren’t treating it as a difference over dollars; they’re treating it as if a principle is at stake, even if they seem to be struggling to find the principle:

-snip-

read more:
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/fiscal_cliff_republicans_have_no_principles/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

high density

(13,397 posts)
2. The GOP seems to have the ability to get away with anything
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 01:24 PM
Dec 2012

This is what happens when a crazed political party wants to get into government simply to stop government. And low-information people keep voting for them, only to bitch about the inaction and blame it on "both sides." It's like hiring a PETA activist to run a poultry farm; they're just going to shut it down.

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
3. They are NOT confused
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 02:29 PM
Dec 2012

they are desperately holding on to the singular, most base "principle" that they have - keeping the tax rate for the richest folks as low as possible.

Make no mistake, if this thing were reversed, if this somehow was about getting the top 2% a tax cut and the other 98% of us getting a tax increase, these motherfuckers would be home for the holidays chugging the egg nog and totally gleeful having all agreed on getting it passed.

What has them the MOST upset, is they are totally against the wall in trying to fight against the upper income folks having a tax increase. They could care less about you, me, our families and neighbors.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. Silly--of course they have principles. Oppose Obama, in whatever he does--
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 02:48 PM
Dec 2012

that is their guiding principle. That explains most of what they have done over the last four years.

Igel

(35,323 posts)
5. Omission vs. commission.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:29 PM
Dec 2012

They don't want to vote in such a way that they're raising taxes.

Not acting just lets them expire.

Similarly, (D) had the same kind of goofball rhetoric. Obama said he wouldn't raise taxes. Expiration of the * tax cuts, therefore, wasn't raising taxes. It was a negative decrease, a reversal of a tax cut. For many, even if taxes went up it couldn't be called an "increase."

For some shallow folks, symbols matter more than reality and words more than deeds.


Arguably that's also the way forward. If they automatically expire and the (R) do nothing, ah, well, they tried. Then they can trumpet lowering tax rates at least on some. Much of the rhetoric you hear from both sides turns on claiming ownership of the tax reductions that would follow.

Then there's also the balanced salvation of $200 billion a year (or thereabouts) from those earning more than $250k/year (families, that is) and the $90 billion/year tax reductions that'll be sure to solve the $1.2 trillion/year deficit.

world wide wally

(21,748 posts)
6. They have principles. Of course their principles suck...They are determined to fuck the American
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:31 PM
Dec 2012

people over by hook or by crook.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
7. Republicans will gladly raise taxes on the rich.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:50 PM
Dec 2012

Just as long as they get to push grandma down the stairs too. Otherwise it wouldn't be worth it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fiscal cliff: Republicans...