2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumChris Matthews is a statesman!
The "Hardball" host becomes the MSNBC journalist conservatives most love to hate
BY DAVID BAUDER, ASSOCIATED PRESS
To his boss, Chris Matthews has become a statesman. His critics probably have other words.
The veteran MSNBC host raised his profile as much as any member of the television commentariat during the presidential campaign. His 5 p.m. Hardball show has seen viewership jump by 24 percent this year from 2011, 17 percent for the rerun two hours later.
Matthews symbolized MSNBCs growing comfort in being a liberal alternative to Fox News Channel. He engaged in an uncomfortable on-air confrontation with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, seemed nearly apoplectic when President Barack Obama flubbed his first debate and had to apologize for appearing grateful that Hurricane Sandy might have helped Obamas re-election effort. With Keith Olbermann out of sight, Matthews essentially replaced him as the commentator that most annoyed conservative viewers.
During the run-up to the Iraq War, he just became really, really partisan and became even more so when MSNBC decided to become the anti-Fox, said Geoff Dickens, who used to watch Matthews as a fan and now monitors him regularly as part of his job with the conservative Media Research Center.
Matthews is not afraid to say what he thinks. Hes a former newspaper columnist and one-time aide to a 1980s era Democrat, House Speaker Tip ONeill. He seriously considered running for the U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania a few years back, where he probably would have been asked repeatedly to explain why he voted for George W. Bush in 2000.
-snip-
more:
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/matthews_raises_profile_during_campaign/
Richardo
(38,391 posts)No talent opportunistic hack.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Thank you.
Tutonic
(2,522 posts)Smart enough to know when to change his colors. Otherwise useless rubble.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Cha
(297,678 posts)And, that's why I recced it. lol
Article said msnbc wants to be the anti-fox.. as opposed to cnn that wants to BE fox.
Filibuster Harry
(666 posts)the same question over and over before his guests are allowed to answer. But I do like the confrontations.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)some people hate him.....his pro-Bush stance "during the runup to the Iraq War" In this article it claims he was always a partisan against it.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)what I see it as he shoots off his blurty mouth before thinking.
big difference there.
he's an actor like most of the rest of them, a bad actor.
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)He does blurt out much of what he says without thinking and without paying attention to whether his guests are speaking at the time. He runs over the top of them with verbal diarrhea on most days. He just isn't consistently good at what he does. He isn't very bright, that's pretty apparent, but if he could quit thinking so highly of himself for no reason, and do some hard work, he could be better than, say, some runt from the lucky sperm donor's club like Lukie Russert.
Yep, he has a few days where I understand what he "could" be. But he hasn't felt the need to bother becoming better and as he ages, he is far far worse than he used to be. He gets distracted and seems to lose his train of thought, he mutters, he just isn't all there some days. The worst times are when he is nasty mean for no reason, or because he hasn't processed what a guest said or maybe just didn't hear them right. That is embarrassing to watch. Sometimes I am surprised when his MSNBC contributors bother to return for appearances on his show - the looks on their faces when he rambles off or gets all huffy/sharp without cause tell me that they are calculating whether he is so far gone that it will damage their reps to come back again.
I rarely watch him anymore.