Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
15. She just needs to retire. She's already passed her "best if used by" date...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 04:06 PM
Oct 2016

... and is quickly approaching her "do not use after" date.

tavernier

(12,388 posts)
17. Nurse Jackie, I'm a licensed nurse too,
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 04:47 PM
Oct 2016

born on same day and year as Andrea Mitchell. Sunday we will both be 70.

I still work as a nurse, washing and sometimes lifting private patients (some weighing in at 200+ pounds), and at our local high school, subbing for people who call in. Often that means serving on the lunch line, hoisting thirty pound hot mashed potato trays out of the oven and into the serving cubicles.

It also means being a liaison between my patients and doctors and families, and a guiding voice to my teens at the school.

My patients and students don't seem to think I have a "best if used by" date, so I hope that you would kindly not use that term. After all, our next president will be only one year younger.

I don't care for Mrs. Greenspan myself. I think that she is a vindictive person with many scores to settle against democrats for the treatment of her idiot husband.

Still and all, I would rather that everyone takes exception to her words and insinuated policies rather than at her age.

Thanks, my friend, and as you know, I almost always agree with everything else you post!!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
19. I get what you're saying ...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 05:34 PM
Oct 2016

... but it definitely applies to Andrea.

Her actual age has nothing to do with it ... it's her attitude that's sour. She needs to go.

I think it's best that I wish a happy retirement for her, rather than something worse.

She can just fade into the sunset.

MountainMazza

(312 posts)
2. IMO -- wikileaks has entirely oversaturated folks
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 12:08 PM
Oct 2016

It's too late to change minds--Trump's ceiling has been hit. On a happy note: Yesterday I voted for the first woman President of the United States of America!

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
8. Me too
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 12:44 PM
Oct 2016

I don't even care other than the media works to make it a huge deal.

I think the email dumps every day are just background noise. People are tired and weary of all of the crap. Unless there is some giant smoking gun with proof positive of something one way or another, I think a lot of people are just over it all.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
20. I think wikileaks is baked in now.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 06:42 PM
Oct 2016

Anyone sensitive to that kind of stuff or easily manipulated is pretty much gone.

We're now in the phase where votes are locking down. It's all down to GOTV now.

 

UMTerp01

(1,048 posts)
5. Yeah it sucks but it also doesn't look good
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 12:14 PM
Oct 2016

I'd say this is the biggest thing to come out of the Podesta emails because you have Chelsea Clinton herself voicing concerns about how the Clinton Foundation operated. It just doesn't look good. The optics are not good. Now ultimately, I have talked to Hillary supporters who have said that they don't like it and that as long as they don't see that Hillary herself made policy decisions related to pay for play, this is a non story. They are also keeping in mind that this is Russia trying to interfere with the election and that overall is their greater concern and is actually energizing them more to vote and make sure Trump doesn't win.

But sorry....we can try and ignore this all we want but the timing of this is not good. I don't think it makes any impact ultimately but I'm pissed that people were so reckless over email because had it not been for these fucking Podesta emails what would the media be talking about right now?

LonePirate

(13,424 posts)
6. Mitchell will still be talking about Clinton's emails or foundation on January 20, 2025
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Oct 2016

She is obssessed

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
11. I don't give a rats ass ..
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 01:01 PM
Oct 2016

About some STOLEN emails put out there that could have been altered by a rapist from an Ecuadoran embassy and his Russian hacker buddies ....



I

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
9. The whole msnbc crap is pathetic
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 12:50 PM
Oct 2016

They are just churning crap.

Half the ads are for their own stupid shows.

Thank fuck for Tivo and mute buttons.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
12. Mitchell is the worst. I refuse to watch her.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 01:06 PM
Oct 2016

Her obvious hatred for the Clinton's drives he biased "news" hour making her look more and more like a hack conservative propagandist. If I happen to be watching M$NBC I switch off as soon as I see her face. I suggest everyone do that. If she has no viewers she will lose her slot on-air and that will be a good thing for all of America.

LowerManhattanite

(2,390 posts)
13. And will have the nerve to still be a little p*ss pot when Hillary continues...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 01:29 PM
Oct 2016

...to NOT fuss over her and the rest of the canapé-snarfing, J. Press-sporting Beltway set of doofuses and their doyennes once she is elected.

She, Sally Quinn and the rest of that desiccated set still have their noodle *sses in a bundle over how the Clintons didn't kowtow to 'em back in the day.

Landfill coffee grounds called, Andrea...they say “You're bitter.”

wiggs

(7,813 posts)
18. I was listening at 9 when she introduced the segment...talked about 'screaming' front page headlines
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 05:28 PM
Oct 2016

about Foundation corruption. These were her excuse for talking about the emails for almost half an hour. I checked out a couple of the papers she referred to....not only were they not 'screaming', they were secondary to several other stories.

She's pushing an agenda.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
22. Its such an invasion of privacy - and she is guilty herself of that. Love the people
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 06:48 PM
Oct 2016

who say - russian hack - not going to give them a platform.

No one - no person - no company - no politician would want every email they ever wrote out there in public.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Andrea Mitchell...ugh...