Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue Idaho

(5,057 posts)
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 12:50 PM Oct 2016

We don't need term limits, we need campaign limits.

Years to run for president, house, and senate seats? All that time, all that money, all that corruption. We need to limit the time of campaigning before elections. We could learn a lot from the U.K. I suggest that 30 days is plenty long enough to size up candidates before an election. That could reduce costs, corruption, and days away from their elected office.

As it is - our elected officials are in perpetual campaign mode. That may be good for them, but it's bad for America.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We don't need term limits, we need campaign limits. (Original Post) Blue Idaho Oct 2016 OP
getting rid of Citizens United will eliminate 75% of the monies available acrosss the board beachbum bob Oct 2016 #1
True but you can only spend so much money Blue Idaho Oct 2016 #2
I'm gonna need more than 30 days moda253 Oct 2016 #4
money dictates what can be done... beachbum bob Oct 2016 #5
It's not just about the monies frazzled Oct 2016 #3
Yes, Thank You! Blue Idaho Oct 2016 #6

Blue Idaho

(5,057 posts)
2. True but you can only spend so much money
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 12:55 PM
Oct 2016

In 30 days no matter how much money you have. Also, the Supreme Court may balk at limiting "free speech" but I don't think they would squawk at setting date limits.

 

moda253

(615 posts)
4. I'm gonna need more than 30 days
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 01:00 PM
Oct 2016

to get to know enough about my candidates ability to respond to enough questions, concerns, issues, and current events before I am ready to cast a vote. Citizens United is by far what is most wrong with our political system.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
3. It's not just about the monies
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 01:00 PM
Oct 2016

I think the OP is trying to emphasize limitations on the length of time allowed for campaigns (which of course, necessitates the need for excessive amounts of money). Most advanced countries in Europe, as well as Canada, permit only a few months of campaigning, beginning to end. Ours stretches on for 2 full years. Both the primaries and the general election are too distended, and the whole thing has turned into a veritable industry, with a full-time media complement, swag companies, arena rentals, ad agencies, consultants and others making a full-time business out of it.

I fully agree with the OP. I'd like to see 3 months devoted to primaries, and 3 to the general. Even that is a very generous amount of time to devote to political campaigns. More time for actual governing.

Blue Idaho

(5,057 posts)
6. Yes, Thank You!
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 03:54 PM
Oct 2016

Virtually every other civilized nation limits the number of days of campaigning. By doing so - they eliminate the "always on" campaign mode that swallows up enormous amount of money, lays the groundwork for influence peddling, and keeps elected officials from doing their job.

If thirty days is too short, make it four months. But for heavens sake - we must stop the endless campaigning. It's making our democracy worse not better.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We don't need term limits...