The Spokane (WA) Spokesman-Review Endorses Hillary Clinton
The histrionics of the presidential campaign has masked a simple question: Who is qualified? At this point, there is only one candidate who meets this essential requirement: Hillary Clinton.
She is flawed, for sure, dogged by personal and political baggage. Her penchant for secrecy and spin has done her more harm than good. As secretary of state, she made a terribly irresponsible decision to use her own email server, and she wasnt honest about it when it was revealed.
But she is clearly qualified to be president. The breadth of experience from White House, to U.S. Senate, to secretary of state is unrivaled. Her grasp of the issues is impressive. She is not a charismatic leader, but she is tough, focused and cool under pressure. She has a moderate record to run on and her positions are well-known.
That is not the case for Donald Trump, who requires deeper examination.
Conservative Wall Street Journal editorial writer Dorothy Rabinowitz, a frequent Clinton critic, summed it up in a recent column: Her election alone is what stands between the American nation and the reign of the most unstable, proudly uninformed, psychologically unfit president ever to enter the White House.
Remember the question about who would be most suited to take a momentous 3 a.m. phone call? Trump would already be up, revenge-tweeting against anyone who got under his skin that day. For obvious reasons, the commander in chief must have greater impulse control...
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2016/oct/02/clinton-the-rational-choice-for-president/
I don't know it's endorsement history but it favored both John McCain and Mitt Romney when they were the GOP nominees.