Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aggregators gone crazy- (PEC) Clinton 307 Electoral College Votes Execrable 231 -Bayesian 81 (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 OP
Thankie! Lucinda Sep 2016 #1
... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 #3
Good idea to inform folks this is Princeton Election Consortium, elleng Sep 2016 #2
Going up again. triron Sep 2016 #4
Nate vadermike Sep 2016 #5
Who is Nate? gto Sep 2016 #6
Nate Tin. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 #7
Dems taking control of Senate does not look good. riversedge Sep 2016 #8
Right, and that's really bad. elleng Sep 2016 #9

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
3. ...
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 05:01 PM
Sep 2016

Sam Wang ?@SamWangPhD 1h1 hour ago
Has HRC turned the corner in state polling?
Note that this is pre-debate. Don't attribute it to that!
http://election.princeton.edu/history-of-meta-analysis/



...


elleng

(131,077 posts)
2. Good idea to inform folks this is Princeton Election Consortium,
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 05:01 PM
Sep 2016

up front, don't you think?

NOT HAPPY about: Senate snapshot (47 polls): Dem+Ind: 49, GOP: 51,

elleng

(131,077 posts)
9. Right, and that's really bad.
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 05:17 PM
Sep 2016

Thanks the 'msm' + repugs propaganda machine, concentrate on the 'horse race,' and forget where the real value lies. And Dem ptb too.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Aggregators gone crazy- (...