The presence of Gennifer Flowers at the debate only matters if Hillary lets it matter
Gennifer Flowers was a news item in 1992.
Let's suppose most voters under 44 today, who were under 20 in 1992, don't know who Gennifer Flowers is.
I downloaded a spreadsheet of U.S. Census bureau voter data from
http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/p20/577/table01.xls
Here's data from the spreadsheet (spreadsheet has results in thousands so I've added the missing 3 zeros)
Data are from the "Reported Voted" column
..18 to 24 years 4,721.000
..25 to 34 years 10,223,000
..35 to 44 years 12,986,000
_________________________
Sum 27,930,000
..45 to 54 years 17,523,000
..55 to 64 years 20,587,000
..65 to 74 years 15,739,000
..75 years up 10,471,000
_____________________
Sum 64,320,000
So there are about 28 million voters 44 and under, that is, close to about 1/3 of the voters, voters who probably don't know who Gennifer Flowers is.
Of the remaining 2/3, many have forgotten or won't care. And lot's of people who do remember will just think tRump is even more of a scumbag for bringing her to the debate.
So I think if Hillary behaves as if it's a non-event it will be a non-event for everyone but the deplorables.
= new reply since forum marked as read
