Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
1. She invited Marc Cuban
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 06:32 PM
Sep 2016

This is retaliation ... i don't think Clinton will give a shit, butthe short fingered vulgarian certainly cares whether Cuban is there

still_one

(92,219 posts)
2. It would be interesting, but this isn't about interesting, it is about the future of America.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 06:45 PM
Sep 2016

Trumps actions reflect on him, not Hillary, and this will backfire on him

This is an attack on women

If he is stupid enough to bring it up during the debate, and blame the victim for Bill Clinton's adultary he will be torn apart

Everyone knows he is trying to setup a distraction so people won't pay attention to. The crap he says

It won't work

MANative

(4,112 posts)
4. Just like everything Donald does, it's a circus side show.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 06:53 PM
Sep 2016

There is nothing about him that doesn't utterly disgust me. I'd gleefully welcome Bushie back to the Oval before even considering if I'd spit on an on-fire Trump.

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)
5. Having Flowers at the debate would be a major mistake.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 06:55 PM
Sep 2016

He is having a tough enough time with women. To use a mistress to humiliate another woman would play out very badly for him.

enough

(13,259 posts)
7. Absolutely right. First thing I thought, and being a woman, I'm an expert.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 06:57 PM
Sep 2016

Hillary is going to knock this out of the park, by behaving well.

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
8. Exactly.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 07:09 PM
Sep 2016

When she's asked about this, which will invariably happen, she should ask why she should be embarassed about her husbands mistakes and instead talk about the hard work she and Bill have put in to keep their marriage and family going after that, the implied subtext being: Who the hell does this twice divorced, daughter-lusting clown, who's trying to turn this debate into a circus, think he is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gennifer Flowers at the d...