2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrump’s coded racism is as dangerous as his lies. Debate moderators must call it out.
Racism is dead, long live racism.
For years, researchers have argued that the (misguided) social norm of colorblindness changed the rules of racial engagement in politics. Voters have grown hostile to overtly racist appeals and racial language, so when modern candidates want to stoke racial fears, they usually do so indirectly, with dog whistles and coded language. Donald Trump, however, tests the limits of this theory. He sounds the dog whistle loud enough to shatter glass and built a mountain from the molehill of birtherism, a racially coded conspiracy theory former RNC Chair Michael Steele eloquently described as bullshit racism.
Despite his baseless and bigoted attacks on President Obama, Trump and his surrogates insist he has a great relationship with the blacks. This is, of course, untrue, as polling consistently suggests the opposite. But Trumps dissonance is illustrative of an even more troubling phenomenon, especially as the first debate approaches: the remarkable persistence of racism without racists, a phrase coined and explained by sociologist Eduardo Bonilla-Silva. Even though the truly evil racists seem to have disappeared, support for policies and narratives sustain racial inequality remains powerful as ever.
A few days ago, Kathy Miller, a Trump volunteer chair from Ohio provided a perfect example of this trend. Miller said there was no racism before Obama was elected, and If youre black and you havent been successful in the last 50 years, its your own fault. When faced with criticism, she could not understand what she had done wrong, and asked, What did I say that was racist? Ignoring or denying persistent, documented, and legally condemned discrimination against people of color and blaming them for their own suffering is, in fact, racist. Still, Miller and others remain confused.
Which brings us to the debates, which are sure to be equally confusing. Each side will insist they won. Some facts will be checked, and others will not, and viewers desperately need the moderator to maintain a firm grip on reality, as Trump insists on living in his own dystopian fantasy world. Though veteran debate moderator and journalist Bob Schieffer warns, Nobody goes to a ballgame to watch the umpire, we need someone to clearly call out the balls and strikes. And when it comes to racism in America, we need courage and clarity about what racism is and how the candidates plan to address it.
Read more: http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/09/24/trump-coded-racism-dangerous-his-lies-debate-moderators-must-call-out/ugYXsk9Lq1L5hxiTap3ppN/story.html
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)How about if, instead, we get someone to, oh what's the word... argue, um, dispute... oh I got it: how about if we get someone to debate with him!