Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDonald Trump’s absolutely ridiculous response to The Post’s Trump Foundation story
Source: Washington Post
Donald Trumps absolutely ridiculous response to The Posts Trump Foundation story
By Chris Cillizza September 21 at 9:42 AM
On Tuesday morning, The Washington Post published a story headlined: "Trump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems." Written by David Fahrenthold, who has reported extensively about the Trump Foundation, the piece details how Trump directed more than $250,000 of the charity's money to help pay fees related to his businesses. Those payments could qualify as "self-dealing" and violate laws governing how the leaders of nonprofit organizations can use the money they receive in donations.
On Tuesday night, Trump communications director Jason Miller issued a statement disputing Fahrenthold's reporting. Sort of. Actually, not really. Here's Miller's full statement:
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
But, even if I didn't work at The Post and I hated Dave, Miller's response to this latest story about Trump's use of the foundation wouldn't pass the smell test.
Miller starts off by dumping on The Post's journalism with zero evidence to back up his claim that we got our "facts wrong." When? Where? Who? He quickly segues into a bit of political sleight of hand by insisting that the real story of this campaign is the Clinton Foundation and that the media is ignoring it. But the media isn't ignoring it. Not even close! A quick Google search of "Washington Post Clinton Foundation" produces a bevy of results, including an op-ed from The Post's editorial board on Aug. 14 headlined: "A porous ethical wall between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department." It reads, in part:
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Chris Cillizza September 21 at 9:42 AM
On Tuesday morning, The Washington Post published a story headlined: "Trump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems." Written by David Fahrenthold, who has reported extensively about the Trump Foundation, the piece details how Trump directed more than $250,000 of the charity's money to help pay fees related to his businesses. Those payments could qualify as "self-dealing" and violate laws governing how the leaders of nonprofit organizations can use the money they receive in donations.
On Tuesday night, Trump communications director Jason Miller issued a statement disputing Fahrenthold's reporting. Sort of. Actually, not really. Here's Miller's full statement:
In typical Washington Post fashion, theyve gotten their facts wrong. It is the Clinton Foundation that is set up to make sure the Clintons personally enrich themselves by selling access and trading political favors. The Trump Foundation has no paid board, no management fees, no rent or overhead, and no family members on its payroll.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
But, even if I didn't work at The Post and I hated Dave, Miller's response to this latest story about Trump's use of the foundation wouldn't pass the smell test.
Miller starts off by dumping on The Post's journalism with zero evidence to back up his claim that we got our "facts wrong." When? Where? Who? He quickly segues into a bit of political sleight of hand by insisting that the real story of this campaign is the Clinton Foundation and that the media is ignoring it. But the media isn't ignoring it. Not even close! A quick Google search of "Washington Post Clinton Foundation" produces a bevy of results, including an op-ed from The Post's editorial board on Aug. 14 headlined: "A porous ethical wall between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department." It reads, in part:
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/21/donald-trumps-absolutely-ridiculous-response-to-the-posts-trump-foundation-story/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1031 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump’s absolutely ridiculous response to The Post’s Trump Foundation story (Original Post)
Eugene
Sep 2016
OP
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)1. Trumpy!
underpants
(182,832 posts)2. None of the Clintons are paid by their foundation
I looked up the foundation's 990 a few weeks ago.
Gothmog
(145,327 posts)3. Trump has no defense to this story
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)4. Trump's trying every worn old political gimmick in the book.
Blaming your opponent of your own misdeeds, gish gallops, ad hominem attacks,
tapping fears and prejudices, promoting big lies, yada yada...
here's a wiki of them all and you can see for yourself that Trump is
trying them all... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
There's enough here to make Karl Rove drool.
But Trump is deathly afraid of the most powerful and
persuasive political weapon of all... honesty and truth.
And truth, well served, will be the downfall of Trump.
Democat
(11,617 posts)5. Trump's followers are like Jim Jones followers
Whatever he says is true, even though it's not.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)6. His only defense is "Ignore the facts."
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)7. Trump's a deadbeat.