2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumImportant UPDATE to CNN/ORC Ohio poll: only 18% of sample was under 50 years old.
Last edited Thu Sep 15, 2016, 03:45 AM - Edit history (1)
By contrast, in the last 3 election cycles, people under 50 comprised 44-51% of voters.http://www.politicususa.com/2016/09/14/cnn-trump-lead-ohio-polling-50-years.html
Donald Trump will definitely win Ohio if no one under the age of 50 comes out to vote, but that is not going to happen. It may just be an error, but if CNN shaped their numbers to get a newsworthy headline, it would serve as a perfect example how news networks use their polling to make the news instead of reporting on it.
_________________________________________
Also, compared to 2015 PEW figures for party affiliation, this CNN/OR study may have over-sampled Republicans. (I say may because party affiliation can change over time.)
This sample includes 606 interviews among landline respondents and 400 interviews among cell phone respondents.
Respondents were asked questions about whether they are registered to vote, their likelihood of voting, past voting behavior, and interest in the campaign. Based on the answers to those questions, 769 respondents were classified as likely voters. Among those likely voters, 31% described themselves as Democrats, 32% described themselves as Republicans and 37% described themselves as independents or members of another party.
http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/political-attitudes/party-identification/
Ohio party affiliation in 2015
23.7 Republican
30.4 Democratic
40.1 Independent
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)they tailored the poll to fit their horse race. urrrgh
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Complaining about who is being polled is typically what the right wing always complains about, and end up wrong.
With the youth vote, it's difficult to gauge. It's harder to reach young people to poll. However, it's even trying to figure out if young people are actually going to vote or not. It's been said for quite some time that young people aren't all that thrilled about this election. So they are not going to turn out in the numbers you saw with Obama. The pollsters seem to agree with that.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)Ft Myers FL. Ya know?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)No legit pollster can project that.
pnwmom
(109,011 posts)Norbert
(6,041 posts)based on phone surveys. Pollsters back then didn't worry about sample distribution or who actually had telephones on their homes back in the Great Depression.
How did that work out for Herbert Hoover?
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)and that turned out okay. I've posted on here numerous times - back in 2012 and again this year as a reminder - but, after the VP debate in 2012, most people felt that Biden easily beat Paul Ryan. However, the CNN poll had it as a tie and the next day Republican co-workers were happy that "liberal" CNN called it a draw.
However, if you looked at the sample they used, they sampled 8% more Republicans than Democrats - something like 48% Republicans and 40% Democrats. The reality is that Republican turnout never beats Democratic turnout in terms of percentages - even in the 1984 Reagan landslide, Democrats made up 39% of the voters and Republicans 35%. (Reagan won independents handily and got a lot more of the Democratic vote than Mondale did of the Republican vote) - the actual vote turnout in 2012 was something like 40% Democrat and 32% Republican, after being 41%/32% in 2008.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)No. So is it worth getting upset over it?
You cant wake up every morning and get hysterical because a poll here or there says something you dont agree with. My statistics professor in college always used to say that "statistics is as much an art as it is a math."
And of course there is the famous saying, "there are three types of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics."
But many people, especially here, are guilty of confirmation bias. They only trust the polls that show what they think the results should be. And then they attack and scrutinize only the polls they disagree with. Meanwhile they don't pay any attention that the poll they do agree with over-sampled Democrats.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)herding cats
(19,568 posts)I'm still basking in the glow of my rediscovered youth. Don't ruin it for me just yet.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Fl tied pe se, and Oh tu, so with 2 polls showing 7 - 5 for Oh for t-rump, HRC looks to be fairly in good shape even with constant trashing by our lovely worthless media.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Bernardo de La Paz This message was self-deleted by its author.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)5 point loss in Ohio means 500k votes ... Obama won 2012 by 200k votes... If we extrapolate 25percent of those voters will stay home not vote trump .., this is just not possible ...
46 percent of voters in Ohio less then 50 voted in 2012.., 18 percent in CNN is a joke .., that down sampling about 150 voters in 750 sample ...
JEEZ
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)There are a lot more bad polls out there than good ones. And a whole bunch are presented deceptively -- as in not telling people only left-handed widows over 70 were polled.
This poll bucked the rest of the picture and should never have been just swallowed whole.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)how many people use https://www.nomorobo.com/ using a robocall system!
I geet at least 6 or more single ring, robocalls, a week all of which are dropped. I wonder how many other households have the same set up?
BumRushDaShow
(129,667 posts)Best thing I could have ever purchased for this sort of thing. And the "single-ring" only happens on the phones that don't have the device on it so I have the device on my bedroom phone to avoid hearing even the single-ring of illegal/scam robocalls at night while I'm asleep.
I may consider getting the upgrade model but the one I have right now is doing the job.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)triron
(22,026 posts)over 40% were under 45. Very hard to understand a 12 pt swing in 2days but this is one mechanism. Yougov got party affiliation about right according to 2012 data it seems.
about internals of nbc poll. How much of this supposed tightening is really there?
pnwmom
(109,011 posts)triron
(22,026 posts)Clinton won the 18-30 age group by 51-19 margin and 30-45 by 50-30 margin
Yet in the CNN poll according to cross tabs she only won the under 50 by 1. Seems extremely incongruous with the yougov poll. Their data is very suspect since they list N/A for both subgroups under 50. Seems contrived somehow.
triron
(22,026 posts)is Hillary is probably ahead of Trump in Ohio. Likely she is ahead in Florida as well. Same reasons as I have indicated for Ohio (i.e. Yougov had her ahead in Florida as well, although closer)