Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 05:01 PM Aug 2016

WaPo Editorial: Jill Stein’s fairy-tale candidacy

By Editorial Board August 25 at 7:31 PM

GREEN PARTY presidential nominee Jill Stein argues that Americans should not vote for the lesser of two evils. Instead of voting out of fear, they should vote for the most deserving candidate. Unfortunately for Ms. Stein, even if you accepted the logic, it would not lead this year to a vote for her.

Ms. Stein sat down with our editorial board Thursday, as Republican Donald Trump and Libertarian Gary Johnson have done previously. She stressed some important issues, especially climate change. As an activist in her home state of Massachusetts, she worked to shut down polluting, coal-fired power plants, and she says she would bring that activist’s sensibility to the Oval Office. But Ms. Stein’s policy ideas are poorly formed and wildly impractical. Her “activist” approach, she said, involves building “broad coalitions,” but she criticized Hillary Clinton for reaching out to Republicans. She proposes to end all use of coal, oil, gasoline and nuclear power by 2030, guaranteeing a federal job to anyone who wants one along the way, and says she can accomplish this revolution for $500 billion — less than the cost of President Obama’s 2009 stimulus. Even this trifle would be recouped in health savings, she said, as her “Green New Deal” reduced the incidence of asthma, diabetes and other illnesses.

There would no doubt be health benefits. But Ms. Stein is nevertheless spinning up a fairy tale — an appealing fairy tale to some, but still a fairy tale. To support the feasibility of her plan, Ms. Stein cited experts whose models in fact envision an energy transition taking decades longer than she posits. To support her health prognostication, she improbably cited Cuba’s experience losing access to Russian oil after the fall of the Soviet Union, after which, she pointed out, Cubans became healthier. In fact, they became healthier because they could no longer afford to smoke or drink alcohol and because so many involuntarily lost weight. “Cubans survived drinking sugared water, and eating anything they could get their hands on, including domestic pets and the animals in the Havana Zoo,” Richard Schiffman recounted in the Atlantic. “They became virtual vegans overnight.”

On foreign policy, Ms. Stein expressed general accord with her running mate, Ajamu Baraka, who has decried the “unimaginable atrocities fomented by a demented and dying U.S. empire .?.?. and the gangster states of NATO,” though she said she might choose different language. Ms. Stein would “take a good hard look at NATO” and radically reduce U.S. military activity, preferring diplomacy to respond, for example, to Russian President Vladi­mir Putin. But when we asked what would make her diplomacy more successful than the Minsk process that has failed to end the fighting in Ukraine, there was not much of a response.

-snip-

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jill-steins-fairy-tale-candidacy/2016/08/25/3bf8ba1a-6b08-11e6-99bf-f0cf3a6449a6_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-b%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.27c4b9137904

Read the transcript of Jill Stein’s interview with The Post editorial board

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. Jill Stein has not impressed me and there are lots of issues the Green party does
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 05:07 PM
Aug 2016

Not address I am interested.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
3. All Jill lives to do now is kneecap Hillary's campaign
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 05:24 PM
Aug 2016

and that is all that has kept her in the news...

I wouldn't be quite so harsh on her if she at least pretended she was running against Donnie as well...

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. Vote for Stein if you're prepared to eat your cat?
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 05:36 PM
Aug 2016

Lol. Maybe she and PETA's murderous Ingrid Newkirk could team up on a plan to rid the nation of feral cats.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,173 posts)
5. I love how some of those screaming "SEXISM!" if any criticism was thrown Hillary's way
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 06:08 PM
Aug 2016

Now are the first to smear another progressive female politician.

I could almost forgive the vitriol if the Greens were in any way threatening to win or to spoil Democrat chances. But they are not and FFS her platform is made up of positive progressive initiatives. The only difference is she believes (perhaps naively) that these more bolder initiatives could be achieved sooner rather than later. But you'd rather the Greens didn't exist at all I gather.

God bless the Green party. The Democrats need to always be reminded that there is a segment like the 46% that backed Bernie, that her policies resonate with and that it would be folly not to be aware and more inclusive with that segment.

Same happened with Nader. Criticize his timing, his passion, his work (if possible), but the personal attacks and insults I don't get. He was the first to stand up to corporate privilege and abuse of power.

We need more voices like this, not less.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. The Greenies are prancing purists preferring irrelevance
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 06:29 PM
Aug 2016

and wishful thinking to actually making the world a better place. They emerge from hibernation every 4 years to flout their moral superiority before going back to their dens

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
8. Clinton won Democrats 64-35
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 06:29 PM
Aug 2016

Sanders got 35% of the Democratic vote, not 46%.

http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/how-clinton-won/

Adding independents, Republicans, and unaffiliated, Sanders won 43% of the vote. Still not 46%.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_vote_count.html

As for Stein, she's trying to act the spoiler, your claims to the contrary notwithstanding. It couldn't be more obvious.

And as long as she continues to make idiotic statements like stating that Clinton's first act in office might be to start a nuclear war with Russia, I'll continue to mock her, thanks. Pointing out her idiocy is not sexist. It's reality.

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
9. Stein is not a progressive, and she doesn't have any policies. She has a basket of ladybug farts.
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 07:00 PM
Aug 2016

Policies are cogent, reality-based road-maps designed to affect achievable societal change. Stein has nothing of the kind.


killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
6. The Green party doesn't care about building an actual political party
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 06:14 PM
Aug 2016

They only show up every four years during the presidential election and then piss off until the next one.

Here's a minor political party that's actually worth something: http://workingfamilies.org/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WaPo Editorial: Jill Ste...