Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 08:24 AM Aug 2016

Pundits or Trump campaign coaches? A twist in news coverage

LOS ANGELES (AP) — When radio host Hugh Hewitt asked Donald Trump this week if he really meant that President Barack Obama had founded the Islamic State group, it was the equivalent of offering him a do-over.

Trump declined, refusing to back down. While the GOP presidential candidate said Friday he was being sarcastic, the exchange stands as an example of a school of interviewing that some say turns political coverage on its head and others argue that, done right, can be valuable.

"It's journalistic malpractice to lead your witness to give the desired response," said Mark Feldstein, a journalism professor at the University of Maryland. "The standard in journalism is straight, objective questions, and that's what I teach my students."

While Hewitt and his fellow conservative pundits on TV are "partisans, not journalists," he said, "does that allow them to lead presidential candidates?"

-snip-

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/496d89be20024708b82545ba9fc4740b/pundits-or-trump-campaign-coaches-twist-news-coverage

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Pundits or Trump campaign...