2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAnd Common Dreams Speaks
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/08/09/survey-our-readers-417-hillary-clinton-334-jill-stein-134-would-write-bernie
Here are the results of a survey of some 11,000+ members of that unusual website that has often been quoted on DU. Click the link to read more, if you must:
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)These days, though, I'm not seeing people linking to it so often. However, it's heartening to see that Hillary has the most votes in that survey, despite not getting a majority. All votes matter, so the 5000 or so votes for Hillary from that site's readers will be welcome. It's good to know that she has some support from that front. I think they're called the Popular People's Front or something.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Perhaps you can have a word of appreciation for those who are keeping the pressure on Hillary to not do the usual "center-right pivot step". Her chances of winning are much greater if she can draw the sharpest possible contrast with Trump.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)The point is that almost half of those surveyed will be voting for Hillary. I expected fewer than that from readers of that website. I like charts like that one that show me what one faction is planning to do.
Every vote matters, so I welcome those Common Dreams readers to the Clinton fold. They show good sense.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I mean, why should she try to appeal to those who claim to be dead set against her, choosing to vote Jill Stein or throw their vote away to write in Bernie Sanders, when there's a ton of moderate people in the center who will not vote for Donald Trump, and are therefore interested in seeing what she stands for?
The Green Party/BoBers won't listen to her, they've made that clear. They've refused to acknowledge that she isn't a hell demon let loose on earth, let alone see that she is a progressive. She might as well try to appeal to the tea partiers. The moderate Republicans near the center, however; those who see that Trump is a disaster, and who feels that he is the final nail in the coffin for the Republican party they once supported? They are movable, they can be convinced, their support is within grasp.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Lets compare their resume's.
Hillary is center. Extreme left & extreme right are going to have to lean toward her.
She will always however, lean in favor of a strong America with its people functiong together for the better of our society.
No more lopsided division of one before the other. She will ask for compromise.
Her platform, laid out in early 2015 says exactly that.
And that is the only successful way to govern a nation the size & diversity of the USA in a World of extremes.
Her priorities have always been for equality.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Why go after 5 fringe voters when she can have 50 moderate voters?
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)like there is with "some" elements who demand that Clinton cater to them despite their open and obvious hatred of her.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)this isn't just another case of bait and switch?
The right wingers aren't going to vote for Hillary anyway.
And please understand, I think Hillary is standing her ground basically in the middle, and I appreciate that. But my point is that it is the strong voices from the left that allow/compel/remind her to not head of into the normal "junior Republican" land. We all benefit from the strong voices on the left.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)GMAFB! Go! Get away from me! That's a disgusting thing to say about Hillary! I can't even look at you! There's just no having a reasonable discussion with people who think that way about Hillary.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)you're not going to give him a word of appreciation?
I think he'll be hurt.
After all, he's participating!
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Please share.
(Typing on your keyboard doesn't count as an accomplishment.)
Squinch
(50,955 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)who align with Common Dreams.
My point is simply that this tone of superiority that comes from some of the Hillary crowd is neither helpful nor justified.
I bet you would find that the people who align with Bernie, Common Dreams and any of the other taboo things out there are, on average a lot more active -- in useful ways -- than the average people that does a lot of chatting on a website.
Hillary is not my first choice, but I am going to work to get her elected -- not just talk about it. And I will never apologize for believing in the things that Bernie has brought to the forefront. I did get to meet the local Hillary staff today and we're starting discussions about how we can plan rallies, registration drives, etc in a state where it is unlikely the candidate herself will be able to prioritize.
I would suggest that you get a better idea of who the real enemy is out there. It is not Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, or Common Dreams. The enemy is hubris.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)Bernie and Common Dreams people like yourself are much, much better than they are.
Do you hear yourself?
Poor you. No one understands your greatness.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Hillary is actually doing better than most. She's handling herself well and staking out solid progressive positions. She will win by standing up to the bully.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I was visiting the newly opened Hillary campaign office in our state to see how I might be able to help. There actually is a world out there beyond our keyboards, you know.
Unfortunately the staff was not in, so I will go back in the morning.
In other words, I am really not likely to take lectures from keyboard warriors very well.
If you want to lecture me, let's start by what you have personally done this month to win any offices that are being contested.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Squinch
(50,955 posts)a campaign office like YOU have! Where are my palm fronds to fan you with!
Did you think you invented working on the campaign? Do you really think that we don't work on the campaign? It sounds like you really think that.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)supported Hillary. In fact I can't recall much positive coverage they gave her this entire year.
If that's their readers voting then Hills is in pretty good shape.
Thanks
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I was pleasantly surprised to see that over 40% of that group will vote for Hillary. It's not a lot of voters, of course, but every vote is important.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)Curtland1015
(4,404 posts)...judging by the votes, I'm guessing some sort of far left something or other?
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Still, it has a following, and I'm interested in the fact that a goodly percentage of its readers will vote for Hillary. I expect that percentage to rise as the election gets closer, of course.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)This is actually quite a reassuring chart.
Thanks!
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)and one that was very much in favor of someone other than Clinton during the primaries. That so many will be voting for Hillary in November is a good sign. People must be paying attention to what she has been saying since the Convention. I hope even more come to realize that she should be elected.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)Bernie Sanders would be way too far to the right for them. I don't know if they weeded out or drove away their own more moderate faction or if it is just being run by different people than it used to be, but it's a site I enjoyed even five or six years ago (recognizing that it was far left, but I am left of moderate myself) and now it's got that kind of raspy-toned fringe voice to it.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Pretty impressive.
(Sarcasm, of course.)
Considering some of the vehement anti-Hillary nonsense that was incessantly posted from that site during the primaries, I'm a little surprised at the 41.7%. That's probably 30% higher than that "other" website, though I have no doubt many of the members are the same.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)That's what surprised me and why I posted the chart here.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)As you noted, I suspect that number will rise when the time comes to vote.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Even when it's obvious what the better choice is.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)plan to vote for Trump. As an occasional reader of CD, I would describe its relationship to the Democratic Party as loosely analogous to that between the Abolitionists and Republican Party in 1858-59.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Who will vote for Trump from that group.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That is kind of surprising.