Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: No change in debate dates. (Original Post) Cattledog Jul 2016 OP
As it should be DemonGoddess Jul 2016 #1
he's lucky that there will be something to distract his supporters from seeing Fresh_Start Jul 2016 #2
And what that be? MoonRiver Jul 2016 #9
The NFL games Fresh_Start Jul 2016 #11
Now he'll demand the other party candidates be allowed to join in KewlKat Jul 2016 #3
I heard that theory on the Sunday morning politico shows True Dough Jul 2016 #5
Those two don't meet the 15% polling threshold. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #6
And that's all well and fine (and legitimate) True Dough Aug 2016 #13
The games aren't really that compelling RonniePudding Jul 2016 #4
Good point! unitedwethrive Jul 2016 #10
That Trump Putin image would make a great lawn sign. I'd buy a couple. TheBlackAdder Aug 2016 #14
If a third party candidate can reach 15% in the polls for a certain beachbumbob Jul 2016 #7
Debate schedule agreed by both parties in September 2015. A bit late for Trump to coward out. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #8
They better not capitulate bluestateguy Jul 2016 #12

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
2. he's lucky that there will be something to distract his supporters from seeing
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 02:13 PM
Jul 2016

his abject failure in the debates

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
3. Now he'll demand the other party candidates be allowed to join in
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jul 2016

so he'll have detractors..................

True Dough

(17,314 posts)
5. I heard that theory on the Sunday morning politico shows
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jul 2016

Seems to make sense. Johnson is socially liberal. Stein is far to the left. Their presence would hurt Hillary more than Trump, in all likelihood. Besides, if the debate organizers don't cave to this demand as well, it is just another reason for Trump to boycott the debates, arguing that they're rigged in Clinton' favor.

He's such a dog.

True Dough

(17,314 posts)
13. And that's all well and fine (and legitimate)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 12:04 AM
Aug 2016

But we're talking about Drumpf here. He stretches reality and makes irrational cases all the damn time.

 

RonniePudding

(889 posts)
4. The games aren't really that compelling
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jul 2016

Falcons-Saints is a snooze fest and Giants at GB will likely be a lopsided win for GB.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
7. If a third party candidate can reach 15% in the polls for a certain
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jul 2016

Period, they are invited to the debates...been the rule for a couple decades....and trump can throw whatever hissy fit he wants...that will not change....neither Johnson or stein has much traction to get anywhere close.

Trump will chose not to appear for some other reason....he dares not to step out on stage against Hillary....

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
12. They better not capitulate
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jul 2016

That would be like giving a spoiled child what he wants after a temper tantrum.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Breaking: No change in de...