Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

YewNork

(461 posts) Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:29 AM Nov 2012

Our goal was to make Obama (everyone join in) A TWO TERM PRESIDENT!!!!!

Just in case Mitch McConnell and Michele Bachmann haven't heard yet.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Our goal was to make Obama (everyone join in) A TWO TERM PRESIDENT!!!!! (Original Post) YewNork Nov 2012 OP

And WE REACHED OUR GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Obama! onecent Nov 2012 #1

Actually, my goal is to make America as good as it can be .... Scuba Nov 2012 #2

Agree with you there YewNork Nov 2012 #3

Indeed they do, and they deserve to have their faces rubbed in reality. Scuba Nov 2012 #4

Right on!!! damnedifIknow Nov 2012 #5

onecent

(6,096 posts)

1. And WE REACHED OUR GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Obama!

Reply to YewNork (Original post)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:30 AM

Nov 2012

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

2. Actually, my goal is to make America as good as it can be ....

Reply to YewNork (Original post)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:34 AM

Nov 2012

... and making Barack a two-term President is the most direct path to that goal.

YewNork

(461 posts)

3. Agree with you there

Reply to Scuba (Reply #2)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:39 AM

Nov 2012

It's just when the other side says and demonstrates that they'll vote down everything that your president tries to do, they deserve a little throwback.

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

4. Indeed they do, and they deserve to have their faces rubbed in reality.

Reply to YewNork (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:41 AM

Nov 2012

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)

5. Right on!!!

Reply to YewNork (Original post)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:48 AM

Nov 2012

Reply to this discussion