2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI know many of you have said this already but I am truly sad and angry (Cummings)
I live in Maryland but even if I didn't, that man is a national hero. To think that anyone would say a disrespectful syllable in his presence makes me furious. I am disgusted with the tea party lefties, many of them young with white skin, would dare to challenge this man who has struggled in ways that THEY CANNOT IMAGINE. Disgusting. You are disgusting. You are disgraceful. How dare you.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)But I am glad we live in a country where we could boo or cheer as we choose.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)We condone and object to behavior regularly. You do it yourself regularly.
They also don't have the right to boo and cheer as they choose. That is not a right. Some will find out the hard way as they might not be allowed back and alternates might be brought in.
They are a group of dolts protesting a civil rights leader. Truly Trumpworthy.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)There, see how that works?
You and I may or may not like it, and they may or may not be acting rudely, but-- they DO have a right to do it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)People do not have the right to be pieces of shit at a private event in a private building. They can do it but it is not a right. The event does have the right to throw them out on their asses. That is a right. The pieces of shit can boo a civil rights leader all they want but at this venue it is not a right.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)but it IS their right to do it.
They can be blocked from entering the building today if only one of two groups wants them to be.
Serious lack of understanding with respect to rights. We should just send them to your living room to exercise their rights.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)mouth.
That doesn't mean that staying silent is the right decision.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)they are childish disrespectful asshole who do not deserve to be there.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)AllyCat
(16,226 posts)If you disagree, you might find Scott Walker's actions in Wisconsin more palatable.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The lack of understanding about what rights are is frightening.
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)First of all there are no 'unlimited' rights. Freedom of Speech is a classic example. FoS is actually fairly limited. First, it only applies in public spaces. Us old farts can remember the big battle with the Hari Krishnas over what constitutes a 'public space'. Second you are limited in what you can say. You cannot 'incite violence' or 'incite a riot' - the classic being you cannot yell 'fire' in a crowded theatre if there isn't one. You cannot advocate the violent overthrow of the government. And, there may be consequences for your 'free speech'. You don't believe me? Try cussing out your boss. You won't get arrested, but you may get fired.
The DNC is most certainly NOT a 'public space'. Thus, FoS does NOT apply. The folk running the convention have an absolute 'right' to toss you out if they so choose and you would have absolutely NO recourse.
So, don't go talking about your 'inalienable right' to BOO whenever you choose in a non-public arena.
Just sayin'
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Frightening how some understand these things. It really isn't that complicated.
reign88
(64 posts)you only think it's a right based on who is being protested against?
That's dangerous thinking.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Well done. This has nothing to do with rights. Period.
reign88
(64 posts)I doubt you are as upset, or upset at all, when it happens to those you don't support. That's all I was pointing out.
There are plenty of times private and public events alike are disrupted by protests. Heck, an entire Trump rally was shutdown at one point over concerns of violence.
I wonder where you stood on that? Maybe you were as opposed to that behavior just as you are this, and if so, kudos to you.
Quite frankly I don't like it when it happens anywhere. It doesn't draw anyone to your cause who wasn't basically already there, and it scares away those that are just trying to listen to the actual message you're trying to get across.
Eh...I digress though. Sorry, I think I might just be a little politic'ed out.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)That doesn't mean they aren't assholes.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Well, exactly.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)You chose to put your voice out there announcing that you won't object to their behavior.
riversedge
(70,306 posts)be taken into consideration. It was shameful what they did to Rep. Cummings.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)I wonder if the diehard tea party kids are responding hatefully because of the support Hillary Clinton received from the Congressional Black Caucus? That, plus ignorance, could explain it.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)And I still am, at the disrespect shown to Rep. Cummings, a heroic Titan of our party, and to other speakers of color and women speakers. Mostly as far as I could tell by a handful of young white men who very clearly yearn for attention more than for social and economic justice.
I know these people from a lifetime spent in close proximity to the campus left. They couldnt be bothered to register a voter or knock on a door but they will pontificate and preach all day long.
Hillary is smart to do her best to rein them in and then focus on winning the center of the electorate. The "progressive" holdouts were never going to vote for her anyway.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)I graduated from college in 2011. I used to be like those people before I got to college. But when I saw what they actually stood for I matured pretty quickly.
I am now just a Progressive Democrat who has a healthy pragmatic side. If I get 80% of what I want, I know I don't throw a tantrum and cry sellout. Getting 80% of what you want is cause for an end zone dance.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)I've been a college professor for 30+ years. I've seen generations of young people encounter leftist theory ("get woke" they now say, as if they invented it). An initial rush of messianic righteousness usually gets tempered by real world experience over time. But some -- especially white straight men -- hit their peak as svengalis of righteous outrage (this is true on the campus far right as well). I honestly believe it is as much about getting young women to like them as it is about seeking social justice, it's masculine display of emotion and passion. It damn near sank Occupy Wall Street too. It's a path to attention and power and self-justification for people who are too narcissistic and attention-needy to be trusted with power in any actual political action or struggle or movement. It's also appealing to mediocre men looking for excuses for their own failures in life.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)And it's more complicated than that.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)We were right.
It's not 1968 anymore.
Scruffy1
(3,257 posts)I have to agree with you about the about their narcissism. Most of the the leftist groups are simply cults created to satisfy their leaders need for power. I see the same thing in some of the BLM groups. The real problem I have with them is that they have no pragmatic, doable solutions. They also are generally closed minded and believe that they have the only answer. While I've always been an anti-capitalist to a large degree I shudder to think what it would be like if some of these people were in power. Meet the new boss, worse than the old boss.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Never trust anyone who claims to have all the answers.
reign88
(64 posts)on what you are talking about. Particularly the getting young women to like them part.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)We're the People's Front of Judea
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)wryter2000
(46,082 posts)What you said
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Much appreciated.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)That's going a bit far. Freedom of speech and all that. Nobody has the right to not be heckled by opponents, privilege or not.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Like I said, free speech and all that.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)Free speech is one issue.
Disrespect is another issue.
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. Apples and oranges.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)has a right not to be heckled in a Democratic Party event. He's not running for office. He owns his damn office. He's an elder and a hero. He deserves complete respect in this setting, in my opinion.
People who confuse disrespect with debate should not be in our party.
groundloop
(11,523 posts)FREE SPEECH is about the right to debate ideas which may not be popular with others. IMO those hecklers were merely trying to draw attention to themselves as opposed to any ideas or beliefs which they felt were worthy of debate. They were self serving assholes and should have been ushered out immediately.
treestar
(82,383 posts)They have it and they used it. But that doesn't mean they cannot be opposed or subjected to criticism for what they said. No one said they had no legal right to say it. They said that it was rude and disrespectful.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)Zambero
(8,968 posts)Cummings has paid his dues and painfully so in behalf of advancing the cause of human rights. The spoiled children who tried to shout him down did not help their cause. Cummings deserves a whole lot better.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Frances
(8,547 posts)(from Lonesome Dove)
If Trump is elected President, the guys who were so rude to Cummings will probably go along with Trump because they won't be brave enough to stand up to a dictator.
They remind me of the people who protested against the Vietnam War because they didn't want to get hurt themselves, and then once they were safely off the hook, voted for Reagan and ushered in a repressive economic era for middle class voters.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)calimary
(81,500 posts)I'll never forget it, either. Total betrayal.
groundloop
(11,523 posts)He took extraordinary measures to avoid going to war, but once he safely escaped that he became just another right wing shill.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Because that's pretty much the same dynamic as what happened last night, except instead of regular Tea it was Green Tea responsible.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Lemme answer that---no.
The little Joe Wilsons in attendance last night made the exact same impression that he did.
Not a good look.
Free expression is part of democracy, and part of that free expression is for people to accurately characterize the Green Tea children throwing their pathetic little temper tantrums yesterday.
After that, the Green Tea hecklers can go back to their parents' basement and resume their normal mode of 'activism'--harassing women and POC on Twitter.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)In any event, I hope the Green Tea hecklers spend all day outside enjoying the glorious Philadelphia summer weather.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)It was a temper tantrum.
The primary process was democracy. We elected a nominee - THAT was democracy.
The interruption and heckling of a civil rights icon was nothing but pure petulance and disrespect for the outcome of the DEMOCRATIC process.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You really can't excuse this behavior from white privileged Green Tea punks and then object to it when Republican white privileged Tea punks do it.
Democrats have enemies on the left as well as the right, and sadly some of those enemies got behind our lines last night.
They belong at the fart-in, not the convention.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Debate and disagreement are fine. Disrespect hiding behind overtly racist privilege is not democracy.
Those white men tried shouting down every speaker of color before Michelle Obama took the stage. And most women. That is not rambunctious democracy. That's racism and misogyny.
The Democratic convention is a private event. Despite being part of an election process and federally regulated as such, it is not a government event or a public space. This is not about free speech.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Spit peanut shells and make fart noises while sitting on one's ass during the national anthem at a baseball game.
One CAN do all those things. It doesn't mean one should.
The clearest sign of an immature asshole is that he or she doesn't understand the difference between prohibition and decorum. One is free to do most anything. It is social GRACE that prevents it, and that is what the asshole protesters at the DNC lacked completely (I won't call them Sanders supporters anymore, as he's given them a roadmap for GRACE which they've rejected in favor of assholery, and the vast, vast, vast majority of Sanders supporters are following his lead).
AllyCat
(16,226 posts)You are right. No grace at all. They yelled during every speaker. Every single one. They have a right, but no grace.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)And you're right about them no longer caring about ( or respecting) Sanders. Everyone who talks on this thread and others about how what they do is protesting, has no clue. You can protest without disrespecting. They're like the Westboro klan; maybe not as egregious, but on that side of the continuum.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)Thank you.
jalan48
(13,886 posts)It's a political convention. Telling delegates how they can/should act sounds like something Republican's would do. Don't take it so personally.
Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)They may be judging themselves by their intentions but the rest of the world is judging them by their actions.
This was a net negative for the Bernie or Bust "movement."
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)I'm looking for a string where the OP uses the ridiculous behavior of a handful of immature yahoos (or is it Houyhnhnms, I can never keep them straight) and uses their behavior as justification for rejecting "leftist" policies (from standing AGAINST the TPP to standing FOR Michael Brown) and for urging others to do the same.
I am tired of talking about real issues and if someone has a good straw man that will help me avoid doing that, it would be much appreciated.
This party has come together to defeat Trump and put Hillary Rodham Clinton into the White House AND to take back BOTH chambers of Congress.
Join us.
UNITE
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Post removed
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)a varied and well thought out message to inspire those to help defeat Trump.. The BoB'ers decided to drown out that message and chant the same crap over and over. Seriously, I got it the first 25 times. I just wished they gave as much respect as they were demanding.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Even though Cummings outshined the protesters, interrupting him was rude and uncalled for.
The chants removed the masks from the protesters' faces and revealed their true agenda - demoralizing voters.
They failed and blunted their influence in the process.
shireen
(8,333 posts)I'm in MD too and I adore Cummings. Did the idiots boo at him? I tell ya ... if i had been on the floor I would have hit them. Elijah Cummings is a national treasure.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)women's rights. This is a man who grew up with white people spitting on him because of the color of his skin. A man who helped change our country, for the better. And this wonderful man, who has more integrity in his little finger, had to put up with white people spitting on him again. Unbelievable. I'm ashamed to be white, again. Those people don't speak for me...and yes, I haven't got over my anger from last night.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)....I wonder if there was any room in the Convention timetable to allow him a do over?
nolabear
(41,991 posts)"No TPP"? Seriously?
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...the RW media has been pushing the meme that BLM activists are terrorists, and they were disrupting Rep Cummings speech.
c-ville rook
(45 posts)It is unreasonable to believe that one of the DNC leaders (he is on the Platform Committee and I think Rules as well) was not going to take a hit when you had them at the beginning of the event less than 24 hours after the DNC chairwoman resigns.
I know this was not the plan when Cummings was put into the spot. I expect the DNC thought smooth sailing. And then the emails.
Answer:
Do not allow what happened at the top of the party apparatus to happen. Pay attention to the rank and file when they go this is messed up for 9 months.
However, I am sorry for Cummings and the direction the event took. But blame the Leadership -- not the membership.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...given that it was during his speech, I was wondering whether Rudy G had some supporters in the house.
IronLionZion
(45,534 posts)Of course they have the right to protest, but they should choose someone who has a major role in promoting the legislation. Congressman Cummings is not that person.
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Elijah_Cummings.htm#Free_Trade
https://cummings.house.gov/issues
He signed this letter to Obama https://votesmart.org/public-statement/1017527/letter-to-barack-obama-president-of-the-united-states-trans-pacific-partnership
turbo_satan
(372 posts)I think you're confusing Elijah Cummings with John Lewis. Don't get me wrong -- Cummings is a great guy who is worthy of our admiration. But I'd hesitate to call him a hero in the same way I'd call John Lewis (who worked with MLK and who had his head smashed in while marching from Selma to Montgomery) a hero.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)I've confronted real racism. Nasty fucking racism. It doesn't fit the narrative here though.