Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFDR had to be pushed to the left.
Hillary can be pushed to the left.
Sanders and his supporters have started the process. The goal now is to hold her feet to the fire.
Thank you Bernie.
Hillary's Presidency is what we make it to be.
Hillary 2016.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 284 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDR had to be pushed to the left. (Original Post)
ForgoTheConsequence
Jul 2016
OP
PatSeg
(47,602 posts)1. That is true
A lot of people don't realize that. His wife was a big influence on him when it came to social issues.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)2. We try, but we will see if she decides to side with her donors.
DinahMoeHum
(21,809 posts)3. Playwright Tony Kushner said as much. . .
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2003/11/tony-kushner-radical-pragmatist
Bear in mind that this interview took place in 2004.
(snip)
TK: . . .Listen, here's the thing about politics: It's not an expression of your moral purity and your ethics and your probity and your fond dreams of some utopian future. Progressive people constantly fail to get this. . .
(snip)
MJ: You're saying progressives are undone by their own idealism?
TK: The system isn't about ideals. The country doesn't elect great leaders. It elects fucked-up people who for reasons of ego want to run the world. Then the citizenry makes them become great. FDR was a plutocrat. In a certain sense he wasn't so different from George W. Bush, and he could have easily been Herbert Hoover, Part II. But he was a smart man, and the working class of America told him that he had to be the person who saved this country. It happened with Lyndon Johnson, too, and it could have happened with Bill Clinton, but we were so relieved after 12 years of Reagan and Bush that we sat back and carped.
(snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In a nutshell, Hillary Clinton can become a great POTUS, but only if We The People DEMAND that she be a great POTUS.
Bear in mind that this interview took place in 2004.
(snip)
TK: . . .Listen, here's the thing about politics: It's not an expression of your moral purity and your ethics and your probity and your fond dreams of some utopian future. Progressive people constantly fail to get this. . .
(snip)
MJ: You're saying progressives are undone by their own idealism?
TK: The system isn't about ideals. The country doesn't elect great leaders. It elects fucked-up people who for reasons of ego want to run the world. Then the citizenry makes them become great. FDR was a plutocrat. In a certain sense he wasn't so different from George W. Bush, and he could have easily been Herbert Hoover, Part II. But he was a smart man, and the working class of America told him that he had to be the person who saved this country. It happened with Lyndon Johnson, too, and it could have happened with Bill Clinton, but we were so relieved after 12 years of Reagan and Bush that we sat back and carped.
(snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In a nutshell, Hillary Clinton can become a great POTUS, but only if We The People DEMAND that she be a great POTUS.