2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCongratulations, Sanders DNC delegates, you just killed his movement and his revolution.
Heckling, booing, jeering, African-American leaders like Marcia Fudge and Elijah Cummings talking about civil rights, giving prayers, talking about defeating Donald Trump?
Booing Bernie Sanders? When he talks about the need to defeat Donald Trump.
You are sending a very clear message--that the core activists in the Sanders movement are fanatics. That they are incapable of playing a constructive role in anything. That they are nothing but anarchists and vandals looking to break stuff out of anger. That there is no point in working with them.
This is not fair to the greater number of Sanders voters out there, who did have an optimistic vision for the country's future and for our political process.
But, because you can't control your glands, you've taken that all and flushed it down the toilet.
Anger, childishness, petulance, hate--those are the last images people are going to have of his movement--because you couldn't be bothered to show an ounce of respect towards people who disagree with you.
You had a great responsibility to Sanders, to his voters, and yes to the party you pledged to support as a delegate.
And you failed everyone. Because you don't know anything other than to lash out if you don't get 100% of what you want.
Revolutions and activism need to be carried out by adults who know what they're doing. Letting adolescent amateurs carry the standard has predictable and catastrophic consequences.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)JI7
(89,254 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LostinRed
(840 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,921 posts)People expressing their opinions loudly is a time-honored tradition. It means, mostly, that the Democratic Party may attempt an artificial party loyalty, but free-thinking people will have none of that.
It is part of the process.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)People are upset that the tables were weighted. Many of us who supported Bernie wonder if he could be the nominee knowing what has happened. People have a right to protest.
We must unite...but when there is wrongdoing, it really fuels anger in some.
I will still vote for HRC, but I am angry at the process that has led us to this.
annavictorious
(934 posts)These assholes spit in Sanders face today.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)Do you still refuse the right of people to be heard?
stopbush
(24,396 posts)an icon like Elijah Cummings by shouting throughout his entire speech.
That level of disrespect - offered by a bunch of armchair revolutionaries - directed at a man who has walked the walk and personally bled for civil rights, does nothing but alienate potential allies.
No one was hurt more today by this disgusting behavior than was Sen Sanders.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)People can speak out and it is frustrating knowing the deck was stacked. I don't blame them for being angry, but protests don't get any air if they stay in the prescribed area with the prescribed decibel level. They shouted during EVERY speaker up there. It was not a rant against Cummings. They were equal opportunity shouting. Hopefully they are done now that he has spoken.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Just how was the deck stacked against Sanders? It wasn't. No one should be surprised that people within the DNC preferred a lifelong D like Hillary over Bernie who had been openly disparaging of the Party for years. The question is whether the DNC acted in any way to disadvantage Sanders in the primaries. The existence of two e-mails out of 20,000 expressing negative opinions about Sanders hardly constitutes stacking the deck. But here we have some of Sanders' supporters - yourself included - who make a mountain out of a molehill and use said mountain as an excuse to disrespect - as you point out - EVERY speaker at the convention.
These protests were planned weeks in advance of the convention. You're using this molehill as justification for actions that would have taken place whether those two emails were revealed on Saturday or not. The BoB movement goes back months. Your stating as fact that the deck was stacked against Sanders is nothing more than straining to find an excuse for why Sanders lost. The accusation that this or that primary was rigged against Sanders was hauled out like clockwork after each Hillary victory. No one is surprised that you and other Sanders supporters would latch on to something as insignificant as this email dust up to prove to yourselves that every evil you could have imagined was true.
There was nothing noble in the disgusting behavior of these adolescent-minded protestors yesterday. Nothing at all.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)and the information they contain show that he was the target of collusion to keep him out instead of supported by a neutral entity.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)All they prove is that a few people within the DNC didn't like Sanders and expressed those feelings in email. There was no collusion at all. Indeed, no action was taken at all stemming from those emails.
LiberalFighter
(50,969 posts)It appears you are looking for any excuse to denigrate Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
LiberalFighter
(50,969 posts)that he would not have had under RNC rules.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)There are no words. This has been discussed so many times, there is legal action being taken, the media is even covering parts of it, and somehow you missed it.
LiberalFighter
(50,969 posts)and supposedly legal action taken and the media is covering parts of it doesn't make it so.
What it does mean is that it doesn't hold water. That you have read more into it then it really is. Geesh!
JudyM
(29,251 posts)I am not looking to litigate this here, just offering a view you are not seeing.
LiberalFighter
(50,969 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)These aren't free thinking people. These aren't Democrats. These are assholes.
I'm not willing to accept assholes as part of the process at a Democratic convention.
Poor Senator Sanders. How must feel right now knowing that he let these assholes play him?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Is beating Trump more important or calling disaffected progressives assholes more important to you. No wonder the party is divided. You have just as much a responsibility as them to unite everyone. You are failing just like they are. Typical food fight.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)I wonder if at is philosophically different from get a grip. You are so right. Cannot believe how many are STILL slamming ANYONE on this board who supported Sanders in the primary. They have no interest in finding common ground, only division. I will vote for Clinton, but not engage these jerks. Ignore is a nice thing.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Who knows who they really are anyway, right? It's the internet for Christ's sake.
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)I love Sanders and what he has brought to the process. I'm happy with many of the planks that made it to our platform, in part, because of him and the movement we created. I will support Clinton and ignore the people who continue to disrespect us. Peace Bill Hicks 76!
True Dough
(17,311 posts)From billhicks76:
"Is beating Trump more important or calling disaffected progressives assholes more important to you. No wonder the party is divided. You have just as much a responsibility as them to unite everyone. You are failing just like they are. Typical food fight."
You nailed it.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)thanks
JudyM
(29,251 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)cactusfractal
(496 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)They are really part of the Green party...I don't know why they're here.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)If everytime Hillary's name is mentioned they boo. That is not acceptable. If they boo senator warren of the First Lady then drastic action is needed.
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
Post removed
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)JI7
(89,254 posts)You're comment could easily be interpreted as a coming from a republican trying to divide liberals.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)They're booing everyone. They're not racist, just stubborn.
JI7
(89,254 posts)Response to Post removed (Reply #2)
Post removed
pangaia
(24,324 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)minority of them, most of the painfully young. The rule expecting decorum is there for a reason. You can't always get what you want people.
Response to redstatebluegirl (Reply #3)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)the parade of Green Party saboteurs he attracted, they're the problem
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)Don't blame him, his real supporters, or his movement for these people. We can hear their complaints. Now let's defeat Trump.
JI7
(89,254 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)They literally have nothing else. Just hatred of Hillary. They have no other positions, no other message. They are united in their violent, incoherent rage.
reflection
(6,286 posts)Is that what you said doesn't sound at all different than what Paul Ryan said when the recent House sit-in went down. Protest is very American.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 26, 2016, 09:20 AM - Edit history (1)
I'm sorry that's not about policy it's sour grapes.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)That's not 2:1...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)She will do fine in November.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...ok.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Already Dems. Why do statistical facts sound insulting to you? Everybody brags about joke many Indie voters he brought in, but there's no discussion of the other stats? Seriously?
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)other than to destroy the Democratic candidate.. I don't get it..
Response to Peacetrain (Reply #12)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)The same thing some purported Sanders supporters on DU wanted all along. It was never about Sanders. It was about calling attention to themselves. They're the same ones who demanded that everyone kiss their asses before they'd even consider voting for Clinton, all the while having no intention of doing so. It was a small percentage of the whole, but they were very vocal. Some of them are still around.
I sincerely hope that they (and those throwing their little hissy fits at the convention) were never Sanders supporters to begin with and that they were/are mostly GOP infiltrators. The alternative is pretty disturbing, though the thought of infiltrators at our convention isn't much better.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Meet the new left, same as the old left.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)Response to Peacetrain (Reply #12)
auntpurl This message was self-deleted by its author.
RonniePudding
(889 posts)I knew it all along.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)These are the same loud mouthed white privileged jerks we been seeing all Spring.
It's painful right now due to the overt racism, but yeah, it's been there all along
John Poet
(2,510 posts)I don't hold with the behavior of some of the delegates--
and even less so with some of the behavior here...
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...you think the behavior here is worse than the assholes on the Convention floor. Your siggy line is still ajudicating the Primary.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Then it'll disappear again.
I did not expect much disruption at the convention, maybe because I didn't personally want it to happen. However, the Wikileaks bomb makes it more understandable to me. Worst possible timing for the Clinton campaign...
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Excuses
John Poet
(2,510 posts)have aided Trump much more than me showing my Bernie colors in recognition of his convention speech today.
And, I'm not aiding Trump.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)The reality is that in context the emails made absolutely no difference to the vote and who won.
But you and your ilk go ahead an sew all the hate and discord you want. It only confirms my opinions.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)and sometimes... well, never mind.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)Congrats on keeping it civil.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)There are rules here. You're not supposed to break them just because you're losing your mind over the convention.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)Is not "losing your mind"
Watching the death of a movement is actually kind of sad.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Its not that I don't believe you .... it that I don't want to believe you
Response to etherealtruth (Reply #22)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)WTF?
Response to etherealtruth (Reply #32)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts).... and the primary emboldened them to speak
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Hillary supporters, and proved them to be true?
That said, I don't hold with delegates disrupting speakers at the convention. However, I think the email dump and its timing has caused some emotions to overload past the boiling point, among the Bernie delegates who are all "true believers". It's quite understandable.
xocet
(3,871 posts)The Democratic Party establishment and Sec. Clinton's campaign staff need to step back and examine what has led to Trump's popularity and Sanders' popularity. If they do not unite with Sanders' message more fully and more convincingly, it is very possible that Sec. Clinton will lose the election.
Kevin Gosztola - 25 June 2016
Members of the Democratic National Convention Platform Committee shot down an attempt to include specific opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal in the platform, despite the fact that both Democratic presidential candidates have taken positions against the TPP.
The attempt failed because members appointed by Hillary Clinton and DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz claimed it was improper to oppose the TPP when President Barack Obama fervently believes in the agreement. However, by putting party unity before taking a firm stand against the trade agreement, the door was left open for Clinton to go back to supporting the TPP, which was the case when she was secretary of state.
...
Even platform committee chair, Representative E.J. Cummings, chose to vote against the resolution. He, too, bragged about not voting for trade agreements.
I dont want to do anything as he ends his term to undercut the president of the United States. Im just not going to do it. And thats where I stand, Cummings proclaimed. It wouldnt bother me. It would be a harder decision if the language that we have in the document did not already go to what we feel going forward. But in his last six months, Im not going to do that. So, thats where I stand.
...
https://shadowproof.com/2016/06/25/democrats-prioritize-party-unity-including-stand-tpp-platform/
Of course, one may malign and belittle these people as much as one desires. The question remains whether one wants their votes enough to try to get them on board with Sec. Clinton.
This is where the Democratic Party establishment and the supporters of Sec. Clinton actually need to work to earn the unity that will give Sec. Clinton a chance to win the election.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)their lack of interest in hearing a black man talk about civil rights is not accidental I'm going to guess
xocet
(3,871 posts)radical noodle
(8,003 posts)The platform is symbolic and doesn't control what anyone does or doesn't do.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)We know that's not true, but that's how it would appear from this convention. And it's a lie because most of the people who voted for Bernie are supporting Hillary now -- unlike the haters we're seeing on TV.
It is appalling. I am ashamed and furious.
TeamPooka
(24,231 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,376 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)" They are rude, crude , common , and vulgar.
Interrupting, booing, chanting...while someone is speaking....boorish and unacceptable.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)If they boo Michelle Obama tonight when she endorses Clinton on national television, yeah it's done.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)I am literally getting on a plane and coming over there to hurt someone.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)They can take their oligarchy and go home or as was said in Seattle about the BLM, "Arrest them". Set up hearings next week for their bond hearings.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)That they need to vote for Bernie instead of Hillary. That's also the point of the street protests. Not my words - theirs.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Is in the right direction. Hillary has the most pledged delegates already, even Sanders knows it is over, if I was a super delegate the disrespect they have shown those who have spoken so far would change my vote if I had endorsed Sanders to Hillary.
R B Garr
(16,955 posts)The indulgent selfie crowd is just about out of audiences. It's over.
Hekate
(90,727 posts)This is an awful spectacle.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)Some of the behavior today has moved into ridiculous territory, but this is a raucous and energetic convention that will launch the ticket and party forward.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,013 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)reflection
(6,286 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Democrats booing, chanting, jeering, and screaming over a civil rights icon as he discussed his father and his heritage, BLM and women's rights? That's beautiful to you?
Disgusting.
DinahMoeHum
(21,797 posts)- from The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (Haymitch speaking to Katniss)
Totally concur with you, GT.
Thing is, they think the universe revolves around them, with their smartphones, hipster outfits, tech-geek jobs, etc.
Trouble is, they don't get out more and actually talk to people outside their bubble.
Fuck 'em. They ain't making anything happen anyway. Let them learn the hard way.
There are far more Hillary supporters within the Democrats than them. She's now going after the Independents and those Republicans who don't want TrumpleThinSkin around.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)The movement is fine.
berniecrats.net
Voting for progressive downticket candidates is still the mission and it's still happening.
Worry not!
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Cha
(297,353 posts)lastone
(588 posts)Blame DWS and the DNC (and the HRC campaign if they also conspired with them) for the mess THEY made, if the shoe were on the other foot surly every HRC supporter would be doing the same damn thing...
Response to lastone (Reply #56)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)You're backslapping buddies just said that? Kinda makes you lose credibility just like the hecklers. You really want to convince us that idealists who hold tight to their beliefs about social and environmental justice are racist because they oppose the establishment? Sure it's rude. Sure it's maybe the wrong time and place. Sure it's immature. But the piling on and labeling them racists deflates those corrects positions on your part because it just looks like more infighting. Do Hillary a favor and stay positive instead of whining about the protestors mistakes. You need to take the high road so we can get people to support Hilkary beating Trump.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Cummings had nothing to do with DWS
Philly-Union-Man
(79 posts)They weren't rational. We should have taken the party over from the bottom up back then and we'd be looking at nominee Bernie right now. But these people are short sighted, all or nothing "right fucking now!" fanatics.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Proved it...
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Let's focus on beating Trump. This isn't a game. Some of us could end up with a very bad fate if Trump wins. You probably don't understand how afraid we are.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Hijacking the DEMOCRATIC Convention, and using that platform to chant shit, over and over while worthy speakers cannot get their original thoughts said. Drowning out good decent humans to shove a message down the throats of the majority that did not vote for him. Don't be scared, get out the vote and do something.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And telling me to do something and vote, Sheepshank??? Ive been doing that for 30 years...organizing, campaigning and putting my all into it always. Please dont be condescending. I save my vitriol for Trump...not democrats or liberals I disagree with. Scared? I live in a different reality than you...many I know would be targets of Trump...the kind that get put in camps or jails.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)creating the noble screed after the unwarranted attack makes that screed even more useless.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)I'm not blaming him - he seriously underestimated a maturity of many of his followers.
comradebillyboy
(10,155 posts)for the last six months. I watched his surrogate call Hillary a corporate whore from the stage at one of his NY rallies. He was perfectly OK with the Nevada riot. He has fostered this sort of hate for his entire campaign.
mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)calm down people, a few protesters being rude. We're Democrats, we can deal with it. Some of the comments here are worse. When the hall is full, they'll be drowned out. It's not Marcia Fudge's or Elijah Cumming's first convention, they know this. They've seen far worse.
Response to mountain grammy (Reply #68)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
JusticeForAll
(1,222 posts)My perspective from the DNC floor as a Bernie delegate is that the schedule of speakers and voting is totally wrong. The vote for the nominee should be held prior to any guest speaker, or especially the Chair or other DNC official implies who the nominee will be, regardless of whether we ALL know who the nominee will be. The continual mentioning of the presumed nominee prior to an actual vote perpetuates the resentfulness and negative attitude toward the system. Be neutral until the vote....AND after the vote....then yay - we can all be officially for Hillary!
P.S. Instead of shouting bernie or hillary, i am shouting DEMOCRATS! I hope you can enjoy the convention in spite of the raucous Berners who want and fight for a fair democracy.
Cheers and onward to November!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Obama ran the 2008 convention and picked all of the speakers, and was officially nominated after a couple of days.
The convention is there to rubber stamp the voters and promote the nominee. Not to actually pick the nominee--that's done by the voters.
procon
(15,805 posts)but the people who opposed them in the past, just like Sanders protestors at the convention, were never on the side of equality, fairness or justice. Then as now, those who tried to silence one of the Democrats most revered heroes, were only interested in themselves.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ramapo
(4,588 posts)Smart move. Let Hillary, the decent democrat be the enemy of the 'perfect' Bernie Sanders who had about zero chance of being elected and even less of a chance of implementing his promises.
Hold your breath, stamp you feet. Go ahead and show her, vote for Trump or don't vote at all. Then when you wake up one day and Dictator Trump is taking the country to authoritarian land, you can be happy that your last vote 'meant something'.
FloriTexan
(838 posts)This is what happens when you mess around with people's votes.
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)You got 100% of what you wanted and did not care how you got it.
With this much hate among the 'winners' I'd hate to see what it looks like were they to be losers.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)seems unfair.
comradebillyboy
(10,155 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)and think about it.
It might take some time, but it will happen if it is supposed to.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)There is always something else to do.
The best thing for being sad, replied Merlin, beginning to puff and blow, is to learn something. Thats the only thing that never fails. You may grow old and trembling in your anatomies, you may lie awake at night listening to the disorder of your veins, you may miss your only love, you may see the world about you devastated by evil lunatics, or know your honour trampled in the sewers of baser minds. There is only one thing for it then to learn. Learn why the world wags and what wags it. That is the only thing which the mind can never exhaust, never alienate, never be tortured by, never fear or distrust, and never dream of regretting. Learning is the only thing for you. Look what a lot of things there are to learn.
― T.H. White, The Once and Future King
AllyCat
(16,195 posts)Really. People that make comments like this are as bad as the ones out there booing. Or was this just a way for you to take a swipe at Sanders?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)That's right folks!!!
Bernie is pure evil and his supporters are going to vote for Trump!
I heard it on the news!
jalan48
(13,873 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the floor of the Convention right now with Bernie or Bust crowd..... they will boo Hillary off the stage,,,,,, this shit will cost us 25 pts in the polls,,,,not much time until Nov to make that much up...... shameful! Did I mention how Trump's shit eating grin is getting bigger and bigger abt this
byronius
(7,395 posts)Perfect example of how a grinding primary battle eventually reveals true character -- the endless vitriol was effing bizarre, ridiculous, counterproductive, STUPID, and a man I held up as the best possible civil servant refused to speak up against it. He just let that shit roll out like it was real and not mental illness expressed through politics.
It was a devastating mistake, in my opinion. I'm glad he's at long last calling for civility from his supporters -- but the strident boos and accusations of being a sellout are now aimed at him. I continue to believe that had he taken a stand early on this issue and ruthlessly enforced a standard of civil discourse at every turn he might have lost a few crazies but kept people like me in his camp and actually pulled this thing out.
I learned a lot in the last year. A great deal. Things I'll never forget.
I have never hated Hillary, not ever, period. And to that small but very vocal percentage of my fellow Sanders supporters that was equivalent to parading around with a baby on a pitchfork.
Fuck that shit. The imperfect is not the enemy of the good. We're all imperfect, even Bernie.
ecstatic
(32,713 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Get taken over by crazy talk and ugliness.
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)Thank you
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)duncang
(1,907 posts)Mad she had been "silenced". But that is exactly what some in the crowd were doing to the speakers. They are trying to silence them by drowning them out. This is not why I supported Bernie. I will still support Bernie's causes, just not the route some are using there.
ecstatic
(32,713 posts)I had an open mind at various points but some of his supporters made it impossible for me to join his camp.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)MellowDem
(5,018 posts)The anger that is being expressed, some of it pretty poorly, has always been there and will always be there, and it's not Sander's movement or revolution, it's just anger at an unequal system. The Democratic Party isn't adequately addressing it, and many of the powerful and privileged political elite are all about perpetuating it. At best, many people understand the Democratic Party is the better alternative, but it ain't much beyond that, and that's the issue.
All of your criticisms of them are incredibly condescending and part of the problem. More than that, activism is indeed carried out by "amateur activists" all the time. And it can take literally hundreds of years for the message and activism on any issue to find its footing. Your criticisms could be word for word what I've seen of the BLM movement, and it will be just as constructive.
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)We do get it and always have. It is a harsh fact of life for the majority of women and minorities, all of whom are arguably more impacted by the existence of a powerful and privileged political elite. Having our progress or rights with the Dem Party treated as "ain't much" is a serious threat. The Dem Party isn't just a slightly better alternative, it is a massively, life changing, no comparison to the GOP better alternative for us. We get it that those differences in circumstances "ain't much" to many of the people in the movement. The push back you see in terms of Party loyalty comes not from our misunderstanding but yours.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)no need to twist my words and make a strawman. The "movement" that Sanders represents to many has always been there and will always be there, and it's not going away. It's ideas about what make for a better society, and some of it conflicts with the Democraric Party. Fellow Dems will differ on how much they think their leaders should be held accountable and how they should be held accountable versus how much people should bite the bullet, and that will always be a debate, but the movement isn't going away, and that's what the OP doesn't get.
The Democratic Party is better than the GOP, but unfortunately, many comparisons CAN be made, on trade agreements without worker protections, on wars abroad, on corporate lobbying, on financial regulation, on the justice system, on election reform, on education, on healthcare, on Social Security... these issues that are part of what drive the unequal system and where the Democratic Party is often times very similar to the GOP, or way too similar for comfort. That will drive criticism going forward until there is change, and that isn't going away.
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)It is that the substance the arguments leaves out minorities and women and disregards issues that are specific to them. A prime demonstration of that is the fact that having had that just explained to you, you replied with a recitation of ills that addressed those issues not once. And no, problems specific to minority groups and women are not subsumed by the issues on your list.
Furthermore, characterizing the Dem position on the justice system, healthcare, education, environment, election reform and social security as the same as the GOP's is simply false and causes those who are uninformed to make insane decisions like voting for Jill Stein. If you agree with Senator Sanders, are you even listening to him imploring people not to make that ghastly mistake?
The problem is not the "anger" towards a system, it is the fact that it has been misdirected towards minorities, women and the organizations that support them who deserve the highest degree of support rather than attack. If people are repeatedly telling you they experience the way the movement is dealing with their "cause" and "anger" as damaging to them, it would behoove you to listen because women and minorities are not going away either.
As for the point the OP is trying to make, the deaf ears you experience from the PTB and "elite" is exactly what minorities and women experience from the movement. The "revolution" absolutely needs those millions of people and one of the reasons it lost them is because of its constant failure to address those flaws and inadequacies. That will continue to drive the criticism of the movement going forward and until there is change, it isn't going away.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)I'm talking about are progressives in general. The party is becoming more liberal, and it's certainly not just young white Bernie supporters, but many people feel he represented the policies of part of the progressive ideal in ways few nominees have in a long time in the party. The US is not a very progressive country. And there is disagreement on how to move forward. Many progressives think exactly what you say of the Bernie or Busters, and I agree with it, but that progressive section of the party isn't going away, and there is a vocal portion that will continue trying to push the Democrats to the left.
The Democratic position on many parts of those issues is indeed similar (not the same), and in some cases the same, as the GOP, these are big areas where some progressives see a lot of overlap between the parties, unlike gender issues, or specific minority issues, where the difference is much more stark. And that is where some progressives will focus and push Democrats. Ignoring or downplaying the overlap is expected when trying to get unity, but it's there.
It's not surprising to me that different demographic groups have different priorities, but the progressive movement in the Democratic Party will keep growing regardless, and amateur activists have always been a part of the process. I don't think progressives are united at all, I think the stark racial divides in support for candidates reflect part of that, and don't think that's easy to do, especially in a two party system, but they aren't going anywhere, and they aren't new either. Progressives will reflect the same segregation, divides, and misunderstandings of society in general, and any united progressive movement would have to address all of those issues first.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Nice to see some on point thinking in these threads full of screeds.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)The empressof all
(29,098 posts)I certainly don't support their behavior but they certainly got a few people watching and listening who probably would have been turned to the shopping channel. Sometimes a little Drama and Negativity can be an enticement for those rubberneckers!
It's going to be OK
Lot's of my Crazy Conservative family members have turned in to see a fiasco...and have been remarking on facebook how good Booker and Michelles speeches were.
It's all gonna be fine!
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... a big hour and a half into the day's program?
I, for one, now at 11:25 PM, Bernie just finishing up with his speech, believe that all-on-all it was a beautiful day.
Your negativism is showing, geek.
onecaliberal
(32,871 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and Bernie Sanders himself.
onecaliberal
(32,871 posts)That things are going wrong.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)So I don't think it's just cable news. The optics were terrible. The overarching message coming out of the convention from yesterday was disunity, disharmony, and disorganisation.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)The rest can stay home like they do every election.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Seems like it all turned out ok at the end of the day.
glennward
(989 posts)no matter how some of his supporters turn us off.
Hekate
(90,727 posts)I feel relief. And after listening to Warren, Booker, Sanders, and Michelle -- I feel joy as well.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and you cannot stop an idea whose time has come. The time for the end of Trump, the Moscovian Candidate, is at hand. Won't support our NATO allies? That needs to be pointed out a million times.
Gothmog
(145,359 posts)I was at convention and these idiots hurt their cause
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)get to work like the rest of us for positive Progressive change?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)quaker bill
(8,224 posts)So it is not a flawless perfect coronation. People are speaking their minds. It is just not as big as you suggest. Relax, things will be fine.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Don't be so hard on yourselves.
While damage was done, it is not so much that the party won't forgive it.
There's an election still to win. Let's unify and move forward.
Demsrule86
(68,606 posts)Sad because I had hope for this movement.
harun
(11,348 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)These issues are bigger than any candidate or any election.
The only end for this movement is victory or the collapse of civilization or maybe even beyond that the death of humanity otherwise great things continue to be afoot.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)while he was talking about his sharecropper parents is going to help expand the demographic appeal of the Sanders movement?
bigtree
(85,999 posts)...what jeering and heckling Cummings and Fudge is supposed to accomplish.
It points up the mindless destructiveness of this rudderless revolution against our party. Disrespecting reps like Cummings (my congressman) and Fudge, just represents an affront to people like me. You won't get anywhere by alienating these folk's constituencies. You'd think losing the primary election would clue them in.
I really don't believe these people are actually Democrats. Hell. even Sanders is returning to the Senate as an independent.
Dems2002
(509 posts)This is such ridiculous hyperbole. Clearly it is what you desperately hope for, but if you believe that young people passionate about making progressive changes are bad for this country you are clearly a lost cause.
People aren't always nice and polite. We are filled with embarrassing traits. I don't run for the smelling salts though, I dig in and fight for what I believe in.
And I believe in the Sanders Revolution as not one individual. It's never been about just Bernie, which is why he too got booed. It's about changing the face of politics to serve the masses that you clearly despise.
I'm in it for the long haul. I'm also voting for Hillary this election. But I'm not throwing away passionate young voices even if they behave in a manner that I wouldn't. They care passionately about this country and want to see us do better. So do I.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Or another name for them would be Tbaggers, part 2.
Sarah Silverman:
To the Bernie or bust voters: Youre being ridiculous,
Bernie bros want to take their ball and go home if they can't have their way, they sound more like Trumpsters than Bernie bros. They could give a f**k about anybody else, the game is over kids! Grow-up.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Uh...what world are you living in? When's the last revolution that was carried out by such people? Revolution is destructive, hectic, upheaval, etc.
You're describing politics.
sheshe2
(83,801 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)You get to state your opinion, just like the rest of us.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-delegates_us_579687cbe4b02d5d5ed299eb
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And it doesn't confer any special authority to you.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I'm enjoying the irony.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)demanding a participation trophy.