If DWS is allowed to speak at the convention tonight, we're in real trouble.

[Paladin]

For God's sake, somebody in charge: change this foolhardy, potentially disastrous decision.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

1. Lol

[NCTraveler]

2. You do know Trump spoke at theirs, right? nt.

[sarae]

10. Right?

And he supposedly got a bump afterwards! lol

[Cha]

3. GAME OVER!

[katmondoo]

4. How ridiculous can you get

[lapfog_1]

5. According to MESSNBC

she was to speak at a breakfast for the Florida delegation and was boo'ed off the stage and had to be escorted by security out of the hall.

I don't think that DWS will speak at the convention.

[bigwillq]

6. DWS should not speak

She should choose not to speak for the good of the party.

[Evergreen Emerald]

7. Really? Settle down.

Don't fall for the whirling dervishers the media has become. There were a couple of e-mails sent by a couple of stupid people suggesting a couple of stupid things that were immediately shot down by a couple of smarter people. Seriously. If this had been the RNC leak, the media would have laughed off the idea of this.

DWS did not do this, and when she found out about it, she resigned...because she was in charge, even if she had been unaware.

This narrative, that Sanders lost because of the DNC is not factual.

[treestar]

13. She herself did not even send them

I'm thinking people in high places should not use email at all these days.

[RKP5637]

8. It would only serve to introduce a controversy and fodder for Trump to use. IMO

it is, I agree, a "foolhardy, potentially disastrous decision."

[MoonRiver]

9. I don't think she will be seen for the rest of the convention.

Thank Dog!

[B Calm]

11. Party unity seems to be on the back burner.

[IADEMO2004]

12. Somebody in charge? The cat herd?