Hey Mr. Pelley Let me tell you what the double standard is

[dsc]

In your intro to the second half of the Clinton Kaine interview you stated, accurately, that Comey said that there were some classified emails in the emails on her server. You left out the fact Comey was lying when he said it. Compare that to Trump claiming he opposed the Iraq War from the get go despite there being tape from Stern's show where he does the exact, precise opposite. Was he corrected? Oh, Hell no.

[apcalc]

1. You got it...this guy is wack.

[Press Virginia]

2. Was Comey lying when he said that? I've not seen that story

got a link?

[dsc]

3. Yes he was

he admitted as much in his testimony before the committee. He admitted they weren't marked classified.

[apcalc]

4. They were 'mismarked' he said, on questioning.

[dsc]

5. no he said they weren't properly marked

Ie no header, and that they were unlikely to have been recongnized as being marked. The state department said they shouldn't have been marked in the first place.

[renie408]

9. Dammit! Why isn't THAT all over the news?? n/t

[Press Virginia]

6. Markings are irrelevant. The material is what matters.

I didn't recall him saying anything was marked but I did recall him saying it was classified at the time.

[dsc]

7. he most certainly did in his new conference

the one Pelley quoted, and he was out and out lying.

[Press Virginia]

10. I found it. Both his presser and congressional testimony refer to

portion markings which designate classified material.

There were no classified headings but there was marked material contained in the body of the e-mails

[apcalc]

12. It wasn't marked in the way classified material is typically marked...

[Press Virginia]

13. Content classifications are common

the absence of headers doesn't mean the content isn't classified

[Attorney in Texas]

8. I didn't see that either.

[glennward]

11. We just haven't learned to attack the media with e-mail bombs like the GOP. We should be all over

his deceitful butt.