The Real Loser: Truth
From an op-ed yesterday (well, I guess on Monday if you're in EST) in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/opinion/the-real-loser-truth.html?_r=0
A brief history of political prevarication, concluding with:
A fourth factor: most news organizations (with notable exceptions) abandoned their roles as political referees. Many resorted to an atrophied style that resembled stenography more than journalism, presenting all claims as equally valid. Fact checking, once a foundation for all reporting, was now deemed the province of a specialized few.
But as this campaign has made clear, not even the dedicated fact-checkers have made much difference.
PolitiFact has chronicled 19 pants on fire lies by Mr. Romney and 7 by Mr. Obama since 2007, but Mr. Romneys whoppers have been qualitatively far worse: the apology tour, the government takeover of health care, the $4,000 tax hike on middle class families, the gutting of welfare-to-work rules, the shipment by Chrysler of jobs from Ohio to China. Said one of his pollsters, Neil Newhouse, Were not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.
To be sure, the Obama campaign has certainly had its own share of dissembling and distortion, including about Mr. Romneys positions on abortion and foreign aid. But nothing in it or in past campaigns, for that matter has equaled the efforts of the Romney campaign in this realm. Its fundamental disdain for facts is something wholly new.
The voters, of course, may well recoil against these cynical manipulations at the polls. But win or lose, the Romney campaign has placed a big and historic bet on the proposition that facts can be ignored, more or less, with impunity.