Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 01:37 PM Jul 2016

Why does the media give Melania the kid glove treatment compared to Michelle?

Commentators instantly excused Melania on the grounds that she wasn’t a political person – only a spouse. She couldn’t possibly be blamed for the plagiarism.

And maybe they’re right. Maybe she was ill-served by someone in the campaign.

But imagine the reaction if Michelle had plagiarized Nancy Reagan. Or if she’d had a history of posing nude on a bearskin rug. Or if she was the third wife, a “trophy” wife.

What is so different about the two women, that makes the media treat Melania with so much more deference?

Like Melania, Michelle was a reluctant campaigner.

Like Melania, Michelle preferred to concentrate on her own successful career.

But unlike Melania, Michelle never did anything wrong, yet she faced far more criticism.

Both women are tall, striking, and of similar age. But only the sight of the white “supermodel” reduces much of the media into googly-eyed submission.

The Don knew this, of course, when he swapped his second wife for his third. That was part of the attraction. He knows white women like Melania turn many men into mush-brains, and that he’d benefit from some of her reflected glory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama

Although she has campaigned on her husband's behalf since early in his political career by handshaking and fund-raising, she did not relish the activity at first. When she campaigned during her husband's 2000 run for United States House of Representatives, her boss at the University of Chicago asked if there was any single thing about campaigning that she enjoyed; after some thought, she replied that visiting so many living rooms had given her some new decorating ideas.[87] She reportedly turned down requests by the campaign for her to attend fundraisers.[88] Obama was against her husband's run for the congressional seat and after his defeat would have preferred her husband tending to the financial needs of the family in what she deemed a more practical way.

SNIP

In May 2007, three months after her husband declared his presidential candidacy, Obama reduced her professional responsibilities by 80 percent to support his presidential campaign.[20] Early in the campaign, she had limited involvement in which she traveled to political events only two days a week and rarely traveled overnight;[94] by early February 2008 her participation had increased significantly, attending thirty-three events in eight days.[65] She made several campaign appearances with Oprah Winfrey.[95][96] She wrote her own stump speeches for her husband's presidential campaign and generally spoke without notes.[28]

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why does the media give Melania the kid glove treatment compared to Michelle? (Original Post) pnwmom Jul 2016 OP
She's white katsy Jul 2016 #1
Uh. No. metroins Jul 2016 #2
Hillary wasn't tall and beautiful, like Michelle and Melania. pnwmom Jul 2016 #4
I want to see it your way. katsy Jul 2016 #5
Yup. White and beautiful. Two of the most prized commodities in our society. eastwestdem Jul 2016 #3
+1 RonniePudding Jul 2016 #13
So are Hillary, Tipper and Teresa -- all badly treated nt karynnj Jul 2016 #15
I think they are scared to cross tRump MiniMe Jul 2016 #6
Corruption at the highest levels on MSM. GeorgeGist Jul 2016 #7
Because she clearly wants no part of the process. She was a hostage on that stage. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #8
Did you read the passages about Michelle. She didn't want Barack to run pnwmom Jul 2016 #9
The fact she's been mostly absent is a good indication she wants no part of it. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #10
It could equally be a result of Trump deliberately holding her back pnwmom Jul 2016 #12
Because she "knows her place". DawgHouse Jul 2016 #11
Easy Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #14

katsy

(4,246 posts)
1. She's white
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jul 2016

That's it.



On Edit:

Okay white & fills perceived "traditional" role as defined by regressive gop type males. IOW feed me & fuck me

metroins

(2,550 posts)
2. Uh. No.
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jul 2016

Think about if Hillary did it in the 90s. The backlash.

Stop trying to see race in everything.

And to be honest I don't think they are treating her with kid gloves.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
4. Hillary wasn't tall and beautiful, like Michelle and Melania.
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jul 2016

Melanie gets the Jackie O treatment because she looks white and glamorous.

Michelle, by contrast with Melania,, got better treatment when she stopped wearing designer clothes.

From the wikipedia link:

The change was even reflected in her fashion choices, wearing more informal clothes in place of her previous designer pieces.[87] The View appearance was partly intended to help soften her public image,[97] and it was widely covered in the press.

katsy

(4,246 posts)
5. I want to see it your way.
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jul 2016

I really do. But if you remember the depictions of Michelle at that time... racist & demeaning in view of her accomplishments as a woman, and as a black woman.

I remember HRC before & after becoming 1st lady. The knives were out for her also.

It is in the nature of white, conservative gop males to ruthlessly attack and lie and besmirch anyone who threatens their grip on power. Unfortunately for our First Lady, being black is just an additional target on her back. Being highly accomplished & a democrat are the others.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
15. So are Hillary, Tipper and Teresa -- all badly treated nt
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jul 2016

My guess - she is Republican, so they do not attack. The Democrats did not attack Ann Romney, Cindy McCain or the Bush wives. Here, I think it is aggravated because there is so much to really attack.

Consider how xenophobic the Republicans were with Teresa, who for 25 years had been a Republican Senator's wife and who was both accomplished and without a hint of scandal. Can you imagine if Melania were the wife of a Democrat?

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
9. Did you read the passages about Michelle. She didn't want Barack to run
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 02:00 PM
Jul 2016

and she was a very reluctant campaigner herself.

How do you know that Trump didn't make up the whole story about Melania being shy and retiring?

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
12. It could equally be a result of Trump deliberately holding her back
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jul 2016

from the campaign to build up the suspense for the big "reveal." He's a showman, after all.

And he obviously didn't need her in the primaries. He did just fine without her.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why does the media give M...