2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie appreciation thread
Bernis has been an absolute gentleman throughout this whole process. Regardless of what you think of his poliitics, I thiink you have to concede this is an example of how a campaign should be run.
Thirties Child
(543 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)He fought a good fight. I expected him to get on board and support Hillary and Democrats, and he did.
LostOne4Ever
(9,289 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 14, 2016, 03:51 PM - Edit history (1)
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#00009d]Thank you Bernie for all you did. And especially, thank you Bernie for working within the system to bring your revolution. The party and America are better for it!!!
Now lets work together to kick Trump and the Republican's asses! He probably just selected a colossal bigot as a running mate and the GOP has just passed the most hatefilled and bigoted platform in its history!
WE HAVE TO STOP THESE ASSHOLES!!!![/font]
#nevertrump #fucktrump #nevergop #fucktherepublicans
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)(((Regina W))) ?@regwag2003
Cornel West slams President Obama and endorses Jill Stein. Surprised?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/14/barack-obama-us-racism-police-brutality-failed-victims?CMP=share_btn_link
Thanks for the unity ..
840high
(17,196 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)But he's not a Democrat or elected official. He's allowed. And we're allowed to call him on his ugly behavior. Now that West has endorsed the Green Party incompetent loon and quack, Stein, for president - we won't have to put up with his insufferable ass at the convention. So that's a bonus!
[font size = 5]Now BERNIE on the other hand - BERNIE has provided an excellent example for unity that is to be commended and should be followed. So YES. On unity - CHEERS TO BERNIE
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Let them celebrate their match made in wingnut heaven somewhere besides our Democratic Convention.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)WTF Cornel?
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)He spent so much time playing the part of a radical on TV that he failed to notice when he became a caricature of one. His look, with the hair and the scarves, the whole church pastor cadence to his speech, brother this, sister that, ugh. It's like he forgot that time moves forward.
OKDem08
(1,340 posts)I don't think we should disparage one for being resolute regarding their principles.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Maybe Cornel West should spend less time on his "style" and more on his "substance," because he currently has none.
Response to misterhighwasted (Reply #4)
Post removed
840high
(17,196 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)The "positive campaign" disappeared pretty quickly, and what replaced it was disappointing in its resemblance to politics as usual.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)I expected much more from the reputation of Sanders and I was very disappointed how he executed his campaign. I could not disagree with the Op more.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)that won. Slate had a great analysis of how conventional the revolution's campaign ended up being.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/07/how_bernie_spent_his_millions_was_anything_but_revolutionary.html
What did $220 million buy? Ads, consultants, and a dispiritingly conventional campaign.
But what did that money buy, exactly? Where did all those $27 checks go? A close examination of public records and interviews with campaign finance experts and grass-roots organizers suggests that, in some significant ways, a campaign that took in money like folk bandits wound up spending it like drearily conventional pols. In April, the campaign had a burn rate of 143 percent, meaning it was spending nearly half as much again as it was bringing in. A great deal of that money bought a blast of commercials preceding caucuses and primaries across the country, one effect of which was to enrich a small group of Democratic consultants whose compensation is tied to media spending. Disclosure forms examined by Slate suggest the campaign contracted with a front companypossibly created to obscure who made what off the Sanders movementand in one cozy arrangement, effectively shared a third-party vendor with a pro-Bernie dark money group.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #9)
Post removed
George II
(67,782 posts)And, how many more appreciation threads are going to be posted on here?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)our positions.
And I will always speak out against that when I hear it.
denvine
(802 posts)Despite all the negative comments, I think Bernie was great for the process and moving the party to the left.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)more Progressive!
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)work for a better country and a better world. I hadn't felt that way about a candidate since Bobby Kennedy. I will vote for Clinton as I have voted for every Democratic candidate since 1968 but she leaves me flat.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)The Democratic platform now reflects this. What Howard Dean once ironically called "the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party" has been heard from. Bernie's success is something all Democrats and progressives can appreciate and be proud of.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Sanders ran an Honorable campaign focusing on issues for the people.
No corporate bribing Money to influence him. I personally understand this - Sanders works for the betterment of America and especially *all* Americans.
How many years must we wait for another TR/FDR/JFK/LBJ/Sanders candidate?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I say that as someone who likes Sanders. Adding the campaign aspect makes this about the primaries.
Logical
(22,457 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)and you a
sueh
(1,826 posts)will move forward.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)And was a class act through it all. I applaud him.