2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton is one of the most honest people to have ever lived and I can PROVE IT!
Hillary Clinton has been under constant investigation by her political enemies, both on the Left AND on the Right, for nearly a Quarter Century, and she has never been found even once to have committed even the SMALLEST crime EVER!
One cannot face such fervent investigation into every aspect of one's life for a quarter century, never have even the most small misdemeanor crime be found, and NOT be one of the most honest people to have ever lived. The two possibilities cannot coexist. IF there had been even the most minor slipup at any time in her entire life, it would have come out by now.
Ergo, Hillary Clinton is one of the most honest people to have ever lived.
Thanks, Moh, agreed.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)such public perusal?
treestar
(82,383 posts)Probably no one other than Obama who could come out of such scrutiny unscathed.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)JSup
(740 posts)...an entire faction of people constantly investigating me there'd be something that I don't even know about that would do me in.
I do know that just the effect of being constantly investigated would make me paranoid with my privacy.
pamela
(3,469 posts)Did anyone hear that congressman say that? I had the hearing on in the background and, towards the end, I thought I heard one of them say something like...
"Watching your announcement, I listened to you lay out your findings and I thought, 'Yes! We finally got her!"
I thought that was almost up there with when McCarthy bragged about how they had hurt her poll numbers.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)That says something anyway.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)does not mean that he was not being politically partisan. He seriously called her 'reckless' for replying to 3 mislabeled emails, out of 30,000+? And of those, the little "[C]" only appeared way down, buried among the quotes from the long chain of previous contributors. Why hasn't MSNBC mentioned this in the 2 hours since the hearing ended?
Comey could have easily said - when pressed again and again - that he believed she was not aware of these three emails, and therefore was not lying when making statements about classified emails. Instead, he answered questions alluding to the fact that he would possibly fire someone who mishandled classified info in the FBI (but that was a generic comment with no specific facts), inferring that she deserved to be punished, when in actuality, anyone else how failed to read all the way down the chain before replying to an email would have just been given a warning, at worse, in this situation. Talk about partisan. The only reason he didn't recommend charges was that, try as he might, he couldn't find any instance where she broke the law. It had nothing to do with him being upstanding and apolitical.