2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary tweeted: Today's #NetNeutrality decision is a big win
Hillary Clinton Verified account
?@HillaryClinton
Today's #NetNeutrality decision is a big win for consumers, innovation, and freedom of expression on the internet:
Story at the New York Times
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/742775258948767744
Beowulf
(761 posts)for some of her major donors.
LonePirate
(13,431 posts)HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)here's a summary on her position
'Hillary Clinton has indicated support for net neutrality. She gave two thumbs up to FCC chairman Tom Wheelers proposal for strong net neutrality rules, though admitted it was only a foot in the door. Clinton has expressed concern that regulations could mean stagnant competition among service providers, saying weve got to do more about how we incentivize competition in broadband. And shes committed to fighting broadband monopolies, citing Google Fiber in Kansas City as a perfect example of what she wants to see everywhere in the US.
Clintons $275 billion infrastructure proposal, which some have called modest, includes a section on developing US broadband infrastructure, though no specific budget is mentioned. Shes also promised to continue Obamas progress on bringing 5G networks to the US, but those networks wouldnt realistically be widely adopted until the end of her (theoretical) first term.'
here's Bernie's
'Bernie Sanders is so pro net neutrality, his face is probably on dart boards in Verizon and Comcast offices across the nation. In 2014, he gave a fiery Senate speech in support of reclassifying broadband under Title II, even saying that fast lanes were grotesquely unfair. Sanders also led an effort to go after fraudulent cable and broadband pricing, and hes openly stated that Broadband access is a necessity, not a luxury.
The Vermont senators own $1 trillion infrastructure plan is the closest of any candidates promise to the American Society of Civil Engineers own $3.6 trillion estimate needed to repair Americas deteriorating infrastructure by 2020. (However, some economists have questioned the Sanders campaigns math.) Of that large chunk of change, Sanders would spend $5 billion a year for five years improving connectivity and speeds in the US. The only question is whether Sanders can pass such a costly plan without Republican interference.'
from: http://gizmodo.com/the-2016-presidential-candidates-views-on-net-neutralit-1760829072
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Doesnt let Comcast or other backers convince her otherwise
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)I don't believe this for a second, considering even Comcast has its claws in the Democratic party. Tom Wheeler was an isolated event, I don't believe we'll get another one of him anytime soon.